False hopes

Topics related to older 6502-based hardware and systems including (but not limited to) the MOS Technology KIM-1, Synertek SYM-1, and Rockwell AIM-65.
Post Reply
Justin
Posts: 32
Joined: 20 Sep 2013

False hopes

Post by Justin »

I have been enjoying reading olduse.net - a USENET feed that is delayed 30 years. Some of my favorite posts are excited rants about "up and coming" products that turned out to be massive flops. A few weeks back there was much excitement about the IBM "peanut" (which turned out to be the PCjr). Another guy proudly proclaimed that the Apple ][ was dead and an Atari 16-bitter was going to take over (never heard of that particular model - perhaps a predecessor to the 1040ST?).

Here is one relevant to this group:
Quote:
Subject: Comedore's New Machine ?
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Date: Tue, 4-Oct-83 11:55:06 EDT (30 years, 7 weeks, 10 hours ago)
Organization: MITRE Corp., Bedford MA

I am extremely interested in the rumors that Comedore is going to come
out with a home computer based on the Z8000 chip and will come with 512K and
UN*X. There seems to be more in this than just gossip, as Comedore had
contacted both Zilog and Bell.
Is this to ever be or have the plans been shot down in flames ?

Keith Fung
Mitre
Bedford, Mass
There are also some crazy C-64 questions :-)
TMorita
Posts: 217
Joined: 15 Sep 2002

Re: False hopes

Post by TMorita »

If I remember correctly, the Commodore Amiga was orginally supposed to be based on the Z8000.
The Z8000 was late to market, so they wound up using the 68000 instead.

Toshi
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: False hopes

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

TMorita wrote:
If I remember correctly, the Commodore Amiga was orginally supposed to be based on the Z8000.
The Z8000 was late to market, so they wound up using the 68000 instead.

Toshi
And ended up with a better machine.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Tor
Posts: 597
Joined: 10 Apr 2011
Location: Norway/Japan

Re: False hopes

Post by Tor »

Ah, the Commodore 900. At least that's the only Z8000 Commodore I've heard of. But according to Wikipedia it was designed in 1985, and that Usenet rumour posting is from 1983..

-Tor
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: False hopes

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

Tor wrote:
Ah, the Commodore 900. At least that's the only Z8000 Commodore I've heard of. But according to Wikipedia it was designed in 1985, and that Usenet rumour posting is from 1983..

-Tor
Evidently the 8563 VDC was originally intended for the 900 but instead ended up in the flat C-128.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
BigEd
Posts: 11463
Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Location: England
Contact:

Re: False hopes

Post by BigEd »

You may have seen this BDD, but for anyone who hasn't: Bil Herd tells a good story here of VDC adventures:
http://c128.com/phase-locking-vdc-vic-c ... rt-version

Cheers
Ed
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: False hopes

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

BigEd wrote:
You may have seen this BDD, but for anyone who hasn't: Bil Herd tells a good story here of VDC adventures:
http://c128.com/phase-locking-vdc-vic-c ... rt-version

Cheers
Ed
Yeah, the 8563 was a mess. The 8568 was somewhat better but still lacked the ability to block copy more than a page of RAM.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
LGB
Posts: 28
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Contact:

Re: False hopes

Post by LGB »

TMorita wrote:
If I remember correctly, the Commodore Amiga was orginally supposed to be based on the Z8000.
The Z8000 was late to market, so they wound up using the 68000 instead.

Toshi
As far as I know Commodore 900 was designed to have that CPU (Z8000). Amiga (had different name then, can't remember, Lorine or something similar) was not designed by Commodore originally, but the design was bought by Commodore (and renamed to Amiga later). Then having the success of the new Amiga architecture caused the plans with 900 to blow over. As far as I know, I mean ... But AFAIK, it was never planned Amigas to have Z8000, totally different plans.
TMorita
Posts: 217
Joined: 15 Sep 2002

Re: False hopes

Post by TMorita »

LGB wrote:
TMorita wrote:
If I remember correctly, the Commodore Amiga was orginally supposed to be based on the Z8000.
The Z8000 was late to market, so they wound up using the 68000 instead.

Toshi
As far as I know Commodore 900 was designed to have that CPU (Z8000). Amiga (had different name then, can't remember, Lorine or something similar) was not designed by Commodore originally, but the design was bought by Commodore (and renamed to Amiga later). Then having the success of the new Amiga architecture caused the plans with 900 to blow over. As far as I know, I mean ... But AFAIK, it was never planned Amigas to have Z8000, totally different plans.
I think you mean Lorraine.

http://www.amigahistory.co.uk/prototypes/lorraine.html

It does look like I am confusing the C900 with an early Amiga, yes.

Toshi
Post Reply