When I see binary digits written out in 65x code, is the order #%01234567 or #%76543210? I know there isn't really a concept of bit-endianness but is the most or lead significant bit written first?

Usually the most significant digit is written first, like in other number bases.

Yes. And the numbering of those bits is usually from right to left. That is to say, the least-significant bit (the one on the far right) is Bit 0.

-- Jeff

_________________
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html

Ok thanks, so usually #%76543210. When might this "usually" rule of thumb break down and throw me off?

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?

As a visual example, assume you have a 6522 VIA, you have set your data direction register for output and you want to follow that up by setting pin 2 (bit 1) to a 1 (hot), and all others to zero.

To accomplish this you would write hex #$02 or %00000010 to the given via port. Looking at the pins of this via port from left to right, we would observe the following relationship whereas X indicates the pin is hot ( a one) and others are "off" ( a zero) :
hex #$02 or
%0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 will yield a pin relationship of
_ X _ _ _ _ _ _

The reason for this is that the bits are shifted into the via. i.e. shift registers.
> %0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 << Representation after being shifted into the VIA
^ _ X _ _ _ _ _ _
< %0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 << Value as you would code

_________________
Shaking out the dirty bits!

https://github.com/DonaldMoran

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!

I don't remember ever seeing bits written with the least significant on the left and the most significant on the right, but I have seen them numbered in the opposite order. That is, the bits in an eight bit value would be numbered 01234567, where bit 7 is the least significant (the 2^0 = 1 place) and bit 0 is the most significant (2^7 = 128).

This was on PowerPC, which I believe inherited it from POWER. It was as confusing as you might expect.

I have a feeling TI did the same, in the 9900 era. Yep, datasheeet confirms it!

The IBM 360 is the earliest computer I know in which bit #0 is the most significant.

Except for some bit test, set and reset instructions, it is not important to know which one is considered to be bit #0.

_________________
Got a kilobyte lying fallow in your 65xx's memory map? Sprinkle some VTL02C on it and see how it grows on you!

Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)

You say that as competent professional but I have a lightly contrived scenario where a newbie may go astray.

Step 1: Get 6502 executing NOPs on a breadboard. We'll ignore that they should be using 65816 and avoiding breadboards but we'll keep going.

Step 2: Wire 6502 to ROM. Get 6502 to idle loop at $FD00 and $FE00 and use address line 8 to output Morse code. This requires wiring address lines and data lines in a sane order.

Step 3: Wire ROM to RAM. This works when the address lines and data lines are in any order - intentionally or not.

Step 4: Wire RAM to 6522. This is where the fun begins. Any drafts-person will know to measure from one spot. The same principle should apply when extending a bus. Don't make the address lines or data lines match the RAM. Make them match the processor.

Step 5: Attempt to fix hardware bug in software.

_________________
Modules | Processors | Boards | Boxes | Beep, Beep! I'm a sheep!

Yeah, some computer manufacturers numbered bits with #0 as the MSB, for...reasons. Don't know what the rationale may have been, unless it was just that, well, you write the MSB first, but it's always driven me crazy as it fails the simple logical test that place value = 2 ^ bit #. TI is the only place I know of that continued it into the relative modern day, although they seem to have finally abandoned it going by the MSP430 documentation.