The J64C (version 0)

For discussing the 65xx hardware itself or electronics projects.
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

Cool thanks!

When you say 10% to 90%, do you mean 0.5v to 4.5v in this case? Just to get a better understanding on standard terms.
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

So more like this?
quiz2.png
I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:
User avatar
GARTHWILSON
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8775
Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by GARTHWILSON »

J64C wrote:
So more like this?
Yes.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

GARTHWILSON wrote:
Yes.
Yes on both fronts of my post? :lol:
User avatar
BigEd
Posts: 11464
Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Location: England
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by BigEd »

J64C wrote:
I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:
Hee hee - it's a joke of course. But just to be clear, there's no minimum level of competence needed here. There might be a minimum level of willingness-to-learn, of course, which might mean a minimum level of humility. And sometimes, someone will ask a question which is quite deep, and it can be very difficult to give an entry-level explanation. Sometimes, the best explanation (at a given level) is not a fully truthful one, because the truth is messy and full of little details. And sometimes, often, there are matters of judgement and personal preference, in which case there can be several different correct answers.

The most difficult questions of course are the ones which encode some misapprehensions - it's necessary to unpick the misapprehensions before getting to the truth of the matter.
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9428
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

J64C wrote:
I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:

We all started at that "level." Excepting maybe Garth, none of us was born knowing this stuff. :D
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

Thanks guys! This does actually make me feel better.

I'm the first to admit that I have lots to learn. But, what I do learn, I try to learn as well as I can. I'm not one to take short cuts. And if I do take short cuts (in someone else's eyes), it is more than likely it's because I don't know any better, at the time. I try to do everything to the best of my ability and take pride in what I do. That can sometime come across as arrogance, but I assure you it's purely excitement. I often run around the house with circuit boards I have just made, showing my kids "the awesomeness!! :lol:". The kids just roll their eyes and say "yeah, great Dad... :roll: ". Haha!

My background started out as an apprentice in electronics, servicing office equipment in the mid 90's. The schooling side of it was 8 weeks a year at university in blocks of 2 weeks at a time, for three years, in which is now considered as 'Advanced Certificate in Electronics'. I did extremely well, coming first every year out of 150 students. But admittedly the course was fairly basic compared in the scheme of things and didn't even touch on some of the concepts I am getting to grips with here.

It's only over the past twelve months that I have gotten back in to playing around with electronics, with the goal of finally building that computer from scratch.

So that's pretty much me in a nutshell, not a complete newbie, but happy to admit where I don't fully understand things. Hopefully you guys will find me approachable over time. I'm pretty easy to get along with. :D
ThisWayUp
Posts: 49
Joined: 03 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by ThisWayUp »

Walking into this forum and asking a question is like walking up to Jimi Hendrix and asking him how he 'does that one solo thingy, the WEEDLY WEEDLY WEEEEEEEE!!!!' Sometimes I beat myself up for knowing almost nothing and being such a newb but then I remember most here have been doing this stuff, hands on, for longer than I've been alive and I'm no spring chicken. :lol:
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

Very true! :lol:

Feeling more confident with my project today. It's a mass of long wires and heaps of things connected all over the place.

Only running a simple routine, but have managed to dial up the frequency (doubling it each time) staring from a mere 1.5Hz. Amazingly it has been running stable for the past ten minutes at my target goal of 12.5 MHz!

Almost feels like if I can get away with that, with this mess, I'll be able to achieve anything. :D

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.
User avatar
drogon
Posts: 1671
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by drogon »

J64C wrote:
Very true! :lol:

Feeling more confident with my project today. It's a mass of long wires and heaps of things connected all over the place.

Only running a simple routine, but have managed to dial up the frequency (doubling it each time) staring from a mere 1.5Hz. Amazingly it has been running stable for the past ten minutes at my target goal of 12.5 MHz!

Almost feels like if I can get away with that, with this mess, I'll be able to achieve anything. :D

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.
Give it a go - you're not likely to damage anything... That's what I did with my Ruby boards - I started at 1Mhz and took it to 16Mhz on stripboard, then a double sided PCB. I've no real need to go faster as that's not my goal (and I know the memory is the bottleneck on the '816 board)

-Gordon
--
Gordon Henderson.
See my Ruby 6502 and 65816 SBC projects here: https://projects.drogon.net/ruby/
plasmo
Posts: 1273
Joined: 21 Dec 2018
Location: Albuquerque NM USA

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by plasmo »

J64C wrote:

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.
Interested to see W65C816 runs at 25mhz, specifically 25.275mhz.
Bill
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9428
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

plasmo wrote:
J64C wrote:
I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.
Interested to see W65C816 runs at 25mhz, specifically 25.275mhz.

If you extrapolate the FMAX vs VDD curve shown in the data sheet, it would seem 25 MHz is possible on five volts. I ran POC V1.2 at 20 MHz without any issues.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
J64C
Posts: 239
Joined: 11 Jul 2021

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by J64C »

That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V. Then you look at the graph and it does show ~25MHz at 5V. Then even ~40MHz at approx 7V.
User avatar
GARTHWILSON
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8775
Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by GARTHWILSON »

J64C wrote:
That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V
That's the conservative guarantee, to do at least 14. It may (and does) go faster, but it's just not guaranteed to. Forum member "Windfall" has a 65816 running at 24MHz at 3.3V! That's three times the 8MHz it's guaranteed to do at 3.3V.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9428
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: The J64C (version 0)

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

J64C wrote:
That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V. Then you look at the graph and it does show ~25MHz at 5V. Then even ~40MHz at approx 7V.

Welcome to the wacky world of WDC documentation. Especially in their older data sheets, there are quite a few errors. Fortunately, their products are much better than the data sheets would lead you to believe.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Post Reply