Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

For discussing the 65xx hardware itself or electronics projects.
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire-wrap wire

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

ThisWayUp wrote:
Now I'm really confused. When I went to the ISSI website they had no info on any skinny DIPs made for the product #'s my IC's have. So they are functional fakes? :lol: I guess I'll have to wire it up and see what happens.

I've been using ISSI RAMs in my POC units since their inception. I have never seen an ISSI part that wasn't in some type of SMT package...SOJ32 in the case of the 128KB RAM I have used.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire-wrap wire

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

enso wrote:
Your chip is likely a skinny version of the pinout documented here...

I think it's the real deal.

No sir. I quote:

  • The IS61C1024AL/IS64C1024AL is available in 32-pin 300-mil SOJ, 32-pin 400-mil SOJ, 32-pin TSOP (Type I, 8x20), and 32-pin sTSOP (Type I, 8 x 13.4) packages.


None of my ISSI data sheets has ever indicated their SRAMs are available in a skinny DIP. The "skinny" package is likely an SOJ32 × 300 mil, same as I use in my POC V1 units. See attached—SRAM is highlighted in a bluish (I think—I'm blue-green colorblind) rectangle.

SOJ32 × 300 mil ISSI SRAM
SOJ32 × 300 mil ISSI SRAM
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
1024MAK
Posts: 155
Joined: 14 May 2015
Location: UK

Re: Fake Kynar wire-wrap wire

Post by 1024MAK »

ISSI definitely did produce 32K byte SRAM in 28 pin skinny DIP/DIL form. I have an old PC motherboard with bunch of them on. See photo…
ISSI IS61C64AH-20N SRAM with a date code of 9327
ISSI IS61C64AH-20N SRAM with a date code of 9327
ISSI may be like some other semiconductor companies, in that they only keep datasheets of their current range online. So if they have stopped manufacturing DIP/DIL (very likely) for some of their products, they will either have removed the datasheet from being online (assuming it was ever online in the first place) or will have revised it to remove all details of discontinued packages.

Mark
User avatar
enso
Posts: 904
Joined: 29 Sep 2012

Re: Fake Kynar wire-wrap wire

Post by enso »

BDD, you are no doubt correct about current ISSI chips. I was saying that in the past, I've seen ISSI caches with narrow DIP packages. The photo confirms my somewhat unreliable memory...
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. ...Jan van de Snepscheut
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire-wrap wire

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

enso wrote:
BDD, you are no doubt correct about current ISSI chips. I was saying that in the past, I've seen ISSI caches with narrow DIP packages. The photo confirms my somewhat unreliable memory...

Yes, I am referring to "current" (the last 15 years) production. DIP caches had their day in the early-to-mid-1990s.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
enso
Posts: 904
Joined: 29 Sep 2012

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by enso »

In that case, BDD, I am not sure what your objection is.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. ...Jan van de Snepscheut
ThisWayUp
Posts: 49
Joined: 03 Jul 2021

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by ThisWayUp »

So basically I just need to test the chips. I better get up to speed on how to do that. Being a newbie with all this stuff sucks :lol: But I am definitely getting a crash course in how the real hardware works. I feel like I've learned more about how computers and electronics in general work in the last month than I ever did messing around with Arduino or tinkering in Python or C++. And I thought I was making real headway when I wrapped my mind around the basics of DC circuits and standard passive components. :wink:
User avatar
enso
Posts: 904
Joined: 29 Sep 2012

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by enso »

ThisWayUp, a word of advice: unless you enjoy really frustrating experiences, the first time around just order your parts from Mouser or some other reputable source. I love bottomfishing on EBay and AliExpress, but it is a lot easier to put together a W65C02 computer with known-good parts. You can then swap in questionable parts, one at a time, and see if it still works. The other way around, you will be sitting there with a dead machine, wondering where to start.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. ...Jan van de Snepscheut
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

enso wrote:
ThisWayUp, a word of advice: unless you enjoy really frustrating experiences, the first time around just order your parts from Mouser or some other reputable source...The other way around, you will be sitting there with a dead machine, wondering where to start.

Adding insult to injury, your bargain eBay parts could cause damage to your good parts when you put power to your machine if the stars and the moon are aligned the wrong way.

Although the logic behind it completely baffles me, 65xx parts are widely counterfeited. We have had topics on that around here, so it may be worthwhile to find them and learn more about this stuff. When it comes to purchasing 65xx parts, your safest bet will always major electronics distributors who have a reputation to protect.

Incidentally, there are no authorized distributors of WDC parts in China. If a Chinese seller is offering 65C816s, etc., it is very likely they are selling fakes.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
GARTHWILSON
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8773
Joined: 30 Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by GARTHWILSON »

BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
Although the logic behind it completely baffles me, 65xx parts are widely counterfeited. We have had topics on that around here, so it may be worthwhile to find them and learn more about this stuff.
Forum topic "65xx parts sources, genuine and fake" is the main one, and I try to update the head post every time anyone has new information.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
TomC
Posts: 22
Joined: 21 Oct 2010
Location: US

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by TomC »

The 1996 and 1998 versions of the IS61C1024 datasheet include the 300 mil DIP package (1996 lists a 400-mil DIP as well). It was removed in the 1999 version.

I'm trying to determine if the MC6828s I bought are real & functioning but I'll make a separate thread for that.
ThisWayUp
Posts: 49
Joined: 03 Jul 2021

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by ThisWayUp »

enso wrote:
ThisWayUp, a word of advice: unless you enjoy really frustrating experiences, the first time around just order your parts from Mouser or some other reputable source. I love bottomfishing on EBay and AliExpress, but it is a lot easier to put together a W65C02 computer with known-good parts. You can then swap in questionable parts, one at a time, and see if it still works. The other way around, you will be sitting there with a dead machine, wondering where to start.
Yes, I have definitely learned my lesson on that now. I do have all legit chips for my current built. I'm using a Renesas 7164 64k for my RAM.
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
Adding insult to injury, your bargain eBay parts could cause damage to your good parts when you put power to your machine if the stars and the moon are aligned the wrong way.

Although the logic behind it completely baffles me, 65xx parts are widely counterfeited. We have had topics on that around here, so it may be worthwhile to find them and learn more about this stuff. When it comes to purchasing 65xx parts, your safest bet will always major electronics distributors who have a reputation to protect.

Incidentally, there are no authorized distributors of WDC parts in China. If a Chinese seller is offering 65C816s, etc., it is very likely they are selling fakes.
Good to know about the chinese distributors, or lack there of. I was initially losing my mind after I found out the 65c02 I had originally gotten from Amazon was a fake, I was concerned it had nuked my other chips, but I got lucky. I do have to admit this has been an extremely harrowing experience, something I was not expecting :lol:
User avatar
enso
Posts: 904
Joined: 29 Sep 2012

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by enso »

ThisWayUp wrote:
...I've learned more about how computers and electronics in general work in the last month than I ever did messing around with Arduino ...
arduino.jpg
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. ...Jan van de Snepscheut
ThisWayUp
Posts: 49
Joined: 03 Jul 2021

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by ThisWayUp »

enso wrote:
arduino.jpg
:lol: I actually lost interest when my progress was halted by everyone trying to pimp their own libraries , trying to use an IDE that made me want to skip my computer off the pavement, and finding out that 99% of the hardware sold to Arduinoheads its literally just $0.25 IC's on breakout boards for $15.00.

You can do a lot with Arduinos, but in order to do alot you have to basically write everything from scratch and know how all the hardware works anyway, so theres not much point, my 2c.
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Re: Fake Kynar wire and not fake ISSI SRAMs

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

ThisWayUp wrote:
I feel like I've learned more about how computers and electronics in general work in the last month than I ever did messing around with Arduino or tinkering in Python or C++.

This is something Garth and I have been preaching for some time.

The Arduinos and Raspberry PIs of the world have their place. If your goal is to quickly throw together a circuit to implement a specific function, "canned" electronics of this type have a lot to offer. On the other hand, if you want to learn how it all works and gain the satisfaction that comes from designing and building a working computer from basic logic gates, a microprocessor, and some memory, Arduinos and Raspberry PIs aren't going to have much to offer.
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Post Reply