Whoops...

Building your first 6502-based project? We'll help you get started here.
Post Reply
User avatar
AndrewP
Posts: 368
Joined: 30 Aug 2021
Location: South Africa

Whoops...

Post by AndrewP »

... couldn't work why I just seemed to be missing a signal.
Oops.png
(Board is a bit quiet at the moment so feel free to share your whoops stories)
plasmo
Posts: 1273
Joined: 21 Dec 2018
Location: Albuquerque NM USA

Re: Whoops...

Post by plasmo »

Replacing 128K RAM with 512K on Z80ALL. It turns out 512K is bigger in both memory contents and physical size.
Bill

Edit, couple more mis-fit pictures that were posted previously,

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6701&p=86787&hilit=68000+900#p86776

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6701&p=86787&hilit=68000+900#p86782
Attachments
IMG_5565.jpeg
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Whoops...

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

I’ve had a few of those and each time, I metaphorically slapped myself in the head when it happened.

POC V1.0 was partially DOA on the first try due to the DUART having no connection to its /CS pin.  For some reason, I had not linked the schematic to the PCB, so the missing connection went unnoticed during the PCB layout phase.  Naturally the error ended up in the PCB and sent me on a wild goose chase.  Fortunately, a short piece of bodge wire got things working (to be followed by more bodge wiring to fix a design defect).

In another situation, during a PCB layout, I used the wrong footprint for a bus driver.  The SOIC-20 part that I was using was physically wider than the footprint I chose, and due to where the part was located, the wider part simply wouldn’t fit.  I didn’t know at the time that SOIC-20 came into two package sizes...same pin pitch, but different widths.  I had to scrap the PCBs and order new ones.  As I said at the time, it’s only money!
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
User avatar
BigDumbDinosaur
Posts: 9425
Joined: 28 May 2009
Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
Contact:

Whoops...

Post by BigDumbDinosaur »

plasmo wrote:
Edit, couple more mis-fit pictures that were posted previously,

download/file.php?id=22024&mode=view

At least you had conveniently-placed holes through which to route the bodge wiring.  On POC V1.0, I had to run wires around the end of the PCB to make connections—being a four-layer board, I couldn’t drill through it.  My handiwork didn’t look too good, but was stable at 12.5 MHz.

Bodge-Wired POC V1.0
Bodge-Wired POC V1.0
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
jgharston
Posts: 181
Joined: 22 Feb 2004

Re: Whoops...

Post by jgharston »

Don't know if you can see it, but when I tracked this PCB I put the holes for a linking wire too close to the IDC header on the left. I ended up having to shave a shamfer in the bottom of the header to make space for the wire. All 150 of them. ;)
Attachments
pcb1.jpg
pcb1.jpg (4.38 KiB) Viewed 10465 times
Post Reply