Processors sometimes spelled with C
-
jeffythedragonslayer
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 03 Oct 2021
Processors sometimes spelled with C
I notice that these processors are sometimes spelled with "C" and sometimes not, like 65C02. Why is that; does the "C" mean Commodore? Is it more official when spelled with a "C?"
Last edited by jeffythedragonslayer on Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- commodorejohn
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 21 Jan 2016
- Location: Placerville, CA
- Contact:
Re: Processors sometimes spelled with C
CMOS, generally. The 65C02 specifically is a partial redesign that adds some new instructions and tidies up a few issues compared to the original NMOS 6502.
Re: Processors sometimes spelled with C
commodorejohn wrote:
CMOS, generally.
Quote:
a partial redesign that adds some new instructions and tidies up a few issues
As compared to the older NMOS process, CMOS is a chip fabrication technology noted for attributes including better noise immunity and much lower power consumption.
It would've been possible and beneficial to simply migrate the old 6502 directly to CMOS. But it happens to be a good opportunity for making improvements, given that a redesign will be required in any case.
-- Jeff
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: Processors sometimes spelled with C
To compare CMOS logic (used in the 65c02) to NMOS logic (used in the original 6502), see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMOS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMOS_logic
Yes; the 65c02 did not just implement the same 6502 design in a different process, but made many significant improvements. See http://wilsonminesco.com/NMOS-CMOSdif/ .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMOS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NMOS_logic
Quote:
The 65C02 specifically is a partial redesign that adds some new instructions and tidies up a few issues compared to the original NMOS 6502.
Yes; the 65c02 did not just implement the same 6502 design in a different process, but made many significant improvements. See http://wilsonminesco.com/NMOS-CMOSdif/ .
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?