Please let me know if you have any comments, suggestions or bug reports.
VTL02 (VTL-2 for the 6502)
- barrym95838
- Posts: 2056
- Joined: 30 Jun 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Re: VTL02 (VTL-2 for the 6502)
Well, I have reached a save point. Attached is a 971 byte Kowalski version of VTLC02 that is smaller and faster than VTL02C, with all the same features. The Apple //e version would be several bytes shorter for not having to deal with the Windoze line feed nonsense, but I'm not including it for now. I believe I can make it even smaller and faster, but I'm going to pause here and deal with some other items on my plate. The structure is becoming less and less "modular", but who needs all that C.S. pinky-finger-out stuff when there's fat to be trimmed, right?
Please let me know if you have any comments, suggestions or bug reports.
Please let me know if you have any comments, suggestions or bug reports.
Got a kilobyte lying fallow in your 65xx's memory map? Sprinkle some VTL02C on it and see how it grows on you!
Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)
Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)
- barrym95838
- Posts: 2056
- Joined: 30 Jun 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
Re: VTL02 (VTL-2 for the 6502)
Now at 970 bytes and hosted on GitHub. I mean it this time ... I need to take care of a ton of unrelated stuff for a while ...
Got a kilobyte lying fallow in your 65xx's memory map? Sprinkle some VTL02C on it and see how it grows on you!
Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)
Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)
Re: VTL02 (VTL-2 for the 6502)
barrym95838 wrote:
Now at 970 bytes and hosted on GitHub. I mean it this time ... I need to take care of a ton of unrelated stuff for a while ...