6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:17 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1250
Location: Soddy-Daisy, TN USA
Can you believe this made CNN?

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/17/tech/30- ... index.html

Having over 90+ vintage computers myself (MOST of them working and 6-7 Apple IIe's), I find this story laughable.

Maybe I'm the odd duck here. But I've seen people with even larger collections than me.

I just found it funny that CNN thinks that the entire world put these old machine out to pasture and never looked back.

_________________
Cat; the other white meat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10985
Location: England
If it gets the clicks, they feel they've told the story the right way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:33 pm
Posts: 1488
Location: Scotland
At least they got "Apple II".. The UK red-tops called it a 30-year old Apple Mac.. :(

-Gordon

_________________
--
Gordon Henderson.
See my Ruby 6502 and 65816 SBC projects here: https://projects.drogon.net/ruby/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1250
Location: Soddy-Daisy, TN USA
drogon wrote:
At least they got "Apple II".. The UK red-tops called it a 30-year old Apple Mac.. :(

-Gordon


Yeah, that's pretty bad.

However, my wife asked me if I bought my Commodore 5150 one time....LOL

But she's not a computer nerd like me.

_________________
Cat; the other white meat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:09 pm
Posts: 1462
These will probably be the same breed of journalists who can't tell the difference between an A320 and a 747, or between an F-16 and an A-10 - or for that matter, between a HST in GWR colours and a freight train on the ECML. They will then proceed to use a photo of one to illustrate a story about the other. It's not as if the differences are subtle, and there's decades worth of reference material to draw from in case of doubt. It's usually even possible to locate a good photo of any individual aircraft or locomotive by its registration code.

And to be fair, if you have a computer that's 30 years old in 2019, and it has a coloured apple logo on it, it's actually a reasonable assumption that it's a Mac, as the Mac II and LC series were well established by 1989. Unless, of course, you happen to be staring at a photo of said computer which is clearly emblazoned "Apple IIe", has an integrated keyboard and enormous black 5.25" floppy drives, and looks nothing like any Macintosh ever made!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1250
Location: Soddy-Daisy, TN USA
Well, I'm probably over sensitive to all things "computer history". I spend much of my time studying computer history and I sometimes get annoyed when things are just blatantly wrong. For example, there is a Discount Tire store near my house and in their lobby is a sign that has the company history. A timeline.

On that timeline, they refer to other famous events. One of those events is "the first Apple computer". Which is shown as a classic Mac. And the timeline is 1984. Whoever did that sign probably knew the word "Macintosh" but probably never heard of the Apple II or Apple I. So he/she goes out and looks up when the Mac was introduced. The key mistake there is thinking the Mac was the first.

_________________
Cat; the other white meat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10985
Location: England
I think you can draw two things out of this.

One is, if you see that a news source, or a reference work, has rather inaccurate coverage of a topic you're expert in, you might realise that coverage of other topics might also be inaccurate to the same degree.

The other is, that the ostensible purpose of a business may not be what it seems - the classic example being search engines whose purpose is to sell adverts, and social networks whose purpose is to sell adverts. I suppose there have long been television channels whose purpose is not so much to "inform, educate, and entertain" but to sell adverts. And now we have websites whose purpose is to sell adverts: collecting views, trying to produce viral content, selling the huge and carefully segmented audience to the advertisers.

There are one or two news organisations seeking to survive by donation or subscription, perhaps a model that's more likely to deliver news.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:37 pm
Posts: 1004
Ya know what? If the report tickles someone's fancy to go out and google "Apple II" and someone follows enough links to end up here or VCF or anywhere else, what's the harm?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 11:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:09 pm
Posts: 1462
There's no real harm in the CNN article. They at least managed to identify the computer correctly.

I'm much more annoyed by the tabloids who called it a Mac. Sloppy journalism like that is what helps to get people riled up in unhelpful directions about stuff that *actually* matters. (I'm deliberately not quoting examples to avoid degrading this thread into a political rant - I'm sure you can think of some yourselves.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10985
Location: England
whartung wrote:
Ya know what? If the report tickles someone's fancy to go out and google "Apple II" and someone follows enough links to end up here or VCF or anywhere else, what's the harm?


Chromatix wrote:
There's no real harm in the CNN article. They at least managed to identify the computer correctly.


Indeed, and yes!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1250
Location: Soddy-Daisy, TN USA
Oh, I don't believe there is any real harm. I just like poking fun at the modern news media. I listen to NPR almost every day and I have a long list of gripes about them too. I guess I'm just an old man at heart. lol

Now, the flip side to this story....I recently found a video on YouTube while searching for TI-99/4A and one of the highest ranking videos is some stupid kid smashing one with a bat. Click-bait at it's finest. People like that disgust me. I'm sure the CNN article was also click-bait but in a much more innocent way. In fact, it leans on a more positive slant. That kid busting up a TI is garbage and the sad fact is that many people like watching it.

_________________
Cat; the other white meat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 3:37 pm
Posts: 1004
cbmeeks wrote:
I just like poking fun at the modern news media.

Almost completely unrelated, and everyone has their nits.

But, this was rather egregious.

"History" Channel running a short series on Presidents in WWII.

During the segment about the Eisenhower, and the invasion of Italy (1943), showing, you know, "wartime footage", they have film of a B-52 over Vietnam dropping bombs.

Seen one bomber, you've seen them all I guess.

But...honestly.

"History" channel.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 1250
Location: Soddy-Daisy, TN USA
Ha! Yeah, no complaints from me. This topic was an OT anyway. :-)

I love the History Channel for the most part. But I do get annoyed when they air shows that really have nothing to do with history. Shows that are clearly designed to compete with The Walking Dead or GoT.

Anyway..back on topic...being off topic.

_________________
Cat; the other white meat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 5:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:09 pm
Posts: 1462
Yeah, they could have pulled up pretty much any random clip of a B-17, B-25, or Lancaster in action, and it would have been more appropriate than showing the quintessential 8-engined *jet* bomber of the late 20th century. It doesn't take much effort to at least check whether the plane has visible propellers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 12:53 pm
Posts: 4
Speaking of Apple //e's...
I'm still kind of miffed at my sister. When I got a Mac SE/30, I gave her family my //e. With 2 floppy drives, 300 baud modem, parallel printer and a whopping 5MB hard drive. Then a couple years later when they got a new IBM compatible, they just threw it away w/o asking me if I wanted it back.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: