WDC inside logo.

Let's talk about anything related to the 6502 microprocessor.
Post Reply
Silicebit
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Location: Madrid.

WDC inside logo.

Post by Silicebit »

Hi all!.

If you have a 8bit computer with WDC 65C02 processor inside, perhaps you would like use this logo.

Best regards.

6502.org wrote:
Image no longer available: http://burrosoft.en.eresmas.com/WDC.png
ChrisW
Posts: 9
Joined: 14 May 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Contact:

Post by ChrisW »

I like it :D
Silicebit
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Location: Madrid.

Post by Silicebit »

I'm happy that you like it :) , You can use it freely.

Thanks for your great site about the 6502!.

Best regards.

Alfonso.
User avatar
BitWise
In Memoriam
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Location: Berkshire, UK
Contact:

Post by BitWise »

I can hear the distant sound of trademark lawyers rubbing their hands together.
Andrew Jacobs
6502 & PIC Stuff - http://www.obelisk.me.uk/
Cross-Platform 6502/65C02/65816 Macro Assembler - http://www.obelisk.me.uk/dev65/
Open Source Projects - https://github.com/andrew-jacobs
Silicebit
Posts: 5
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Location: Madrid.

Post by Silicebit »

No if you use it without lucrative purpose.
kc5tja
Posts: 1706
Joined: 04 Jan 2003

Post by kc5tja »

Negative -- historical precedent has shown that these kinds of logos are still eligible for penalty of trademark infringement law. If Intel decides that they're losing money because of this logo, AND the claim can be justified in a court of law, then they can issue a cease and desist letter in the hopes of having you take the logo off your website.

The only reason it hasn't happened before in the 6502 or Commodore communities (can't speak for others) is because the lawyers do not see us as a threat. But if (by some fluke) 6502-based systems start to become popular (note: doesn't have to mean the same thing as "selling well"), then Intel can (and will) issue legal notifications, and may even press charges.

This has already happened in the Apple community, particularly with respect to the iPod logo.
blargg
Posts: 42
Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Contact:

Post by blargg »

Trademarks allow people to identify genuine products. Trademark infringement confuses people about who makes product. Thus, trademarks are good for customers. In this case, it's easy to see how that logo could make someone think it was made by Intel. Anyway, the law says that a company has to defend trademark or forfeit it. If it's satire, make it obvious and it will be protected under parody laws (IANAL).
Post Reply