Replacing a 6502 with 65816
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
BigEd wrote:
Looking back to Daryl's note, he says the information came from Garth. I wonder: Garth, could you confirm or correct?
8BIT wrote:
Garth told me that WDC has started producing the 65816 in TQFP again
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
GARTHWILSON wrote:
I'm pretty sure I got that info from someone else on the forum. I just left my second message on WDC's answering machine and don't have the answer yet.
WDC wrote:
We do manufacture the W65C816S6TQG-14 QFP part. We currently only have these parts in small quantities, but can ramp up quantities as needed.
Many of our distributors do not have these parts yet, so if you would like to sample or acquire these parts now we could help you with that request direct.
Many of our distributors do not have these parts yet, so if you would like to sample or acquire these parts now we could help you with that request direct.
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Good to hear. I still have not gotten a return call from them, and they still are not answering the phone, and I did not leave a third message.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
I'd like to use the QFP variant. Which distributer has it? Or where can I order it? As an SMD package QFP is much easier to solder than PLCC and would even save more PCB space.
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Did anyone get hold of one or more W65C816S6TQG ? I was waiting for them to appear in the catalog of e.g. Mouser, but it seems nothing at all has happened for over a year (!), and WDC is not responding to my related query this time.
- BigDumbDinosaur
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: 28 May 2009
- Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Windfall wrote:
Did anyone get hold of one or more W65C816S6TQG ? I was waiting for them to appear in the catalog of e.g. Mouser, but it seems nothing at all has happened for over a year (!), and WDC is not responding to my related query this time.
x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
Windfall wrote:
Did anyone get hold of one or more W65C816S6TQG ? I was waiting for them to appear in the catalog of e.g. Mouser, but it seems nothing at all has happened for over a year (!), and WDC is not responding to my related query this time.
- BigDumbDinosaur
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: 28 May 2009
- Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Windfall wrote:
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
Windfall wrote:
Did anyone get hold of one or more W65C816S6TQG ? I was waiting for them to appear in the catalog of e.g. Mouser, but it seems nothing at all has happened for over a year (!), and WDC is not responding to my related query this time.
x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Quote:
What I'd like to see is the 65C816 in a package in which the A16-A23 outputs are brought out on separate pins and not multiplexed with the data lines. It can be done in a PLCC52, since all that is needed is an additional eight pins. I understand why WDC MUXed A16-A23 onto D0-D7 back in the day, but the reason for doing it disappeared with the demise of the the Apple ][gs
- BigDumbDinosaur
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: 28 May 2009
- Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Rob Finch wrote:
What about something like the 65C265 microcontroller ? I think it has all the address lines brought out, and has a wack of built in peripherals. Some of the chip select decoding already done.
However, for hobby purposes, I prefer to stick with discrete components and an actual 65C816.
x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
If it is desired to use an external ROM [with the 65C265 microcontroller] then some of the connectivity goes out the window.
In the '265 block diagram below I've highlighted the IO ports that are NOT available when an external bus is used.
Another potential limitation is the 265's 8 MHz speed rating. But if it's expected that code will execute directly from EPROM then the 8 MHz limit may not matter much.
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
- BigDumbDinosaur
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: 28 May 2009
- Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Dr Jefyll wrote:
Another potential limitation is the 265's 8 MHz speed rating. But if it's expected that code will execute directly from EPROM then the 8 MHz limit may not matter much.
POC V2 (when built) will be able to shadow ROM in RAM and thus avoid the performance limitations of running the firmware from ROM. I'm also cogitating on how to rig up the logic so the block of RAM that shadows the ROM can be write-protected. On paper, this mess should be able to run at 20 MHz. with only I/O hardware accesses being wait-stated.
x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't NEED no stinking x86!
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
I just got word from WDC, in response to an email I sent last night:
I hope to make and supply this '802 module, unless someone else would like to do it. (If someone else would like to do it, there are other ones I would like to make and supply.) I still need to figure out how to handle the matter of the pins. Interplex, the manufacturer of pins whose diagrams I posted earlier, has been broken up into two or three separate companies apparently, and I need to remember to call the one on the east coast before their closing time, since they don't use distributors. From talking to another part of the company, it sounds like the minimum order on pins may be prohibitively large (like 30,000 pieces on a reel) unless they have a portion of a reel of the right pins sitting around; so I might need to figure out another solution.
Quote:
The 816 does come in a 44 Pin QFP package. [...] To date these products have not been in our general distribution however we are working to get them into distribution and they should be available from Mouser Electronics by next week.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
Pins? Something like this? http://oshchip.org/products/Flip-Pins_Product.html
(unfortunately only up to 20)
(unfortunately only up to 20)
Re: Replacing a 6502 with 65816
What I've done is use headers, soldered to a sacrificial socket. It makes for a lot of extra height though.