Proxy wrote:
FPGAs have PLLs so you can run them at whatever speed you want relative to a video clock. 12.5 seems a little low IMO.
in the case of that post i used the onboard 50MHz clock to generate a 75MHz VGA clock (for 1280x720, which divided by 2 gives you 640x360, slightly smaller than 640x480 but with a modern 16:9 aspect ratio instead of 4:3) and from there divided it by 4 to get the 18.75MHz for the CPU. ...
Yeah, the Vera model is aimed for 640x480 classic 4:3 VGA. I guess the community working on the X16 are working on an HDMI version which would output in 16:9, but IIUC, it would just pillarbox from 16:9 to 4:3 for software compatibility with the VGA / composite / S-video / RGB version of the Vera board. I presume that the pillarboxing would entail running the pixel clock faster than the standard VGA pixel clock.
I'm a from-a-long-time-ago software hand taking very tentative steps into the hardware side, so I just read the various VGA circuit threads with interest, I don't expect I would ever design a VGA board from scratch.