shopping list
-
No True Scotsman
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 22 Mar 2023
Re: shopping list
allisonlastname wrote:
Slight issue:
But yes, I have seen those boards before and they look useful.
Re: shopping list
I'm in US and looking for some recommendations on various sized breadboards to play with. I've heard bad things on the likes of aliexpress and such.
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: shopping list
paritybit wrote:
I'm in US and looking for some recommendations on various sized breadboards to play with. I've heard bad things on the likes of aliexpress and such.
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
Notice I said "solderless" above. Usually when people say "breadboard," they're thinking of these solderless plug-in type; but there are soldered ones too, as I show at the bottom of the custom-PCBs page of the 6502 primer. One use of these is to prototype something with the solderless type, and once it's working, transfer it to the solder-type to make it more permanent and not risk accidentally pulling a wire out and then wondering where it came from. I do a lot of analog stuff where often five holes in a row is not enough, and I like the fact that I can put two component leads in a single hole, or sometimes even three leads in a hole, something you cannot do with the solderless ones.
Using breadboards to make computers brings some failure rate. Most builders will see their creations work; but if just a few have problems due to inductance inductance of long connections (which has nothing to do with the resistance of the contacts), that's a few too many, and those builders will have a lot of frustration we would rather help them avoid. Part of what can be so frustrating is that they'll spend hours tracing out their connections only to verify that schematically they got it all correct, but a design proven elsewhere still doesn't work. Be sure to follow the recommendations in the first seven paragraphs of the AC-performance page of the 6502 primer. I must reiterate that so many think, "I'm only doing 1MHz; it's gotta work!" but it's not the MHz that kills you! It's the speed at which a line transitions from a 1 to a 0, or vice-versa, measured in nanoseconds, especially in clock signals. The ground system is at least as critical, if not more so, and as Jeff said, "It's best to avoid thinking of the Power & Ground Distribution network as something for connecting the chips to the power supply. Where high frequencies are concerned [ie, the slew rates, not the clock rate! —GW], its real job is to connect the chips to one another" (for the signals' return current).
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
- BigDumbDinosaur
- Posts: 9425
- Joined: 28 May 2009
- Location: Midwestern USA (JB Pritzker’s dystopia)
- Contact:
Re: shopping list
paritybit wrote:
I'm in US and looking for some recommendations on various sized breadboards to play with. I've heard bad things on the likes of aliexpress and such.
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
Any reasonably priced good ones / links or vendor someone can recommend?
I have never used a solderless breadboard for any kind of digital work. As Garth notes, lead inductance can quickly get out of hand and result in a DOA unit. It can be done, but requires meticulous work to control lead lengths. You will need to tread cautiously and also be realistic about complexity, especially on a first build.
x86? We ain't got no x86. We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Re: shopping list
GARTHWILSON wrote:
If you really must use solderless breadboards, the BusBoard brand sold by Jameco are good
I personally switched to Twin Industries Hi Temperature breadboards for solderless breadboard projects. They are *very* high quality, and I like the round holes. They also don't cost any more than the BusBoard or Jameco ones.
Quote:
Global Specialties' breadboards used to be good, but I see they're all made in China now. The problem with the Chinese ones is they don't use the right material and shape of the little contacts inside, so connections do not remain dependable. For the last 40 years, I've only used the American-made ones with a lifetime warranty, and have never had contact problems with them.
"The key is not to let the hardware sense any fear." - Radical Brad
Re: shopping list
I don't often use breadboards, but what I chose and have been happy with are the ones from Twin Industries. (They're rcommended by Radical Brad, and that's good enough for me!)
And yes for a trifling extra cost I opted for the high temperature version. Occasionally I find it expedient to solder onto a component lead that's already inserted in the board, and I would hesitate to try that with an ordinary board.
-- Jeff
And yes for a trifling extra cost I opted for the high temperature version. Occasionally I find it expedient to solder onto a component lead that's already inserted in the board, and I would hesitate to try that with an ordinary board.
-- Jeff
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html
Re: shopping list
Very late to the breadboard vs wire-wrapping topic ... but still.
I always decide which option to use based on two factors: Is it analog or digital? And is the circuit experimental or final?
Analog vs digital circuits:
Breadboard can be used for both analog and digital work at modest frequencies (up to a few MHz).
Wire-wrapping analog circuits is not so recommended. The leads of resistors, capacitors, transistors ... are mostly round so a dab of solder is needed (see Reliability section below). So possible but breadboards are easier for this.
For digital work, wire-wrapping is perfect. At least 5 times higher frequencies (up to 20 MHz) and even more with careful routing and attention to other details (same applies to breadboards of course).
Experiments vs implement final design:
If I am experimenting, testing circuit ideas, trying proof-of-concepts, understanding other people's designs, generally "playing around", I will go with breadboards because wiring changes and constant doing/undoing of wires is much faster and easier and convenient in breadboards.
But if the design is (nearly) complete and final, e.g. implementing an existing and tested design, wire-wrapping is no doubt the way to go. After a learning curve of a few days, wire-wrapping will take only around 25% to 50% longer. As an example: the 65816 SBC in pics 1 and 2, took me around 15 hours to complete (3 evenings of 5 after-work hours).
Costs:
One-off tool costs are: 1) manual wrapping/unwrapping combo tool with built-in stripper (looks like screwdriver) and 2) wire cutter. Total less than $20.
Recurring consumables: 5 color reels of 100ft of "proper" kynar AWG30 wire are $50 but they will last you for several projects. I also bought 8-in-1 reels of non-kynar wires for less than $10. So wires are similar in price to 22AWG breadboard wires.
Finally and most importantly: the IC sockets. They are special. They are not always easy to get. And they are expensive. Even several times more than the sockets with turned pins. The wire-wrap sockets have long pins and MUST have square cross-section. Because that is where the reliability comes from. You can however (at the expensive of time) make cheap DIY versions by soldering square male header pins next to regular sockets to achieve the same (see pic 3).
Reliability:
For me, its rock-solid reliability is probably the main reason why I use it for "final" designs. Your design/circuit will not fail because of a loose wire or bad connection. Run your fingers over the wires, drop your board on the floor, throw it during transport ... Just apply power and you are back in business. I know. I brought my wire-wrapped version of Ben Eater's "8 bit breadboard computer" (see pic 4) from Australia to Europe and threw it in my suitcase along with my clothes. Powered up 1st time upon arrival. Try that with a breadboard
.
Also note how much more dense the design can be: the 8"x12" board can accommodates nearly 100 standard TTL/CMOS ICs. And that is with some real-estate taken up by the DIY sockets. Use proper ones could have brought the total count above 100.
And it is as reliable as having a PCB made.
I always decide which option to use based on two factors: Is it analog or digital? And is the circuit experimental or final?
Analog vs digital circuits:
Breadboard can be used for both analog and digital work at modest frequencies (up to a few MHz).
Wire-wrapping analog circuits is not so recommended. The leads of resistors, capacitors, transistors ... are mostly round so a dab of solder is needed (see Reliability section below). So possible but breadboards are easier for this.
For digital work, wire-wrapping is perfect. At least 5 times higher frequencies (up to 20 MHz) and even more with careful routing and attention to other details (same applies to breadboards of course).
Experiments vs implement final design:
If I am experimenting, testing circuit ideas, trying proof-of-concepts, understanding other people's designs, generally "playing around", I will go with breadboards because wiring changes and constant doing/undoing of wires is much faster and easier and convenient in breadboards.
But if the design is (nearly) complete and final, e.g. implementing an existing and tested design, wire-wrapping is no doubt the way to go. After a learning curve of a few days, wire-wrapping will take only around 25% to 50% longer. As an example: the 65816 SBC in pics 1 and 2, took me around 15 hours to complete (3 evenings of 5 after-work hours).
Costs:
One-off tool costs are: 1) manual wrapping/unwrapping combo tool with built-in stripper (looks like screwdriver) and 2) wire cutter. Total less than $20.
Recurring consumables: 5 color reels of 100ft of "proper" kynar AWG30 wire are $50 but they will last you for several projects. I also bought 8-in-1 reels of non-kynar wires for less than $10. So wires are similar in price to 22AWG breadboard wires.
Finally and most importantly: the IC sockets. They are special. They are not always easy to get. And they are expensive. Even several times more than the sockets with turned pins. The wire-wrap sockets have long pins and MUST have square cross-section. Because that is where the reliability comes from. You can however (at the expensive of time) make cheap DIY versions by soldering square male header pins next to regular sockets to achieve the same (see pic 3).
Reliability:
For me, its rock-solid reliability is probably the main reason why I use it for "final" designs. Your design/circuit will not fail because of a loose wire or bad connection. Run your fingers over the wires, drop your board on the floor, throw it during transport ... Just apply power and you are back in business. I know. I brought my wire-wrapped version of Ben Eater's "8 bit breadboard computer" (see pic 4) from Australia to Europe and threw it in my suitcase along with my clothes. Powered up 1st time upon arrival. Try that with a breadboard
Also note how much more dense the design can be: the 8"x12" board can accommodates nearly 100 standard TTL/CMOS ICs. And that is with some real-estate taken up by the DIY sockets. Use proper ones could have brought the total count above 100.
And it is as reliable as having a PCB made.
Re: shopping list
Have I mentioned Verowire? https://verotl.com/catalog/category/vie ... ies/id/28/
RS carry the pens though I can't find the combs or replacement spools; none of the other usual suspects mention it.
It's an enameled wire which melts its enamel at soldering temperatures. You wrap the start of the link, solder it, manage your route on the comb (optional but recommended), wrap around the next pin, solder that, and repeat until you get to the end of the run. Makes things like address or data busses a doddle. I used it very successfully in the past and it's a lot cheaper than wire-wrap - and it can make equally dense circuits without requiring special sockets (or indeed, any sockets at all, if you're confident!)
Neil
RS carry the pens though I can't find the combs or replacement spools; none of the other usual suspects mention it.
It's an enameled wire which melts its enamel at soldering temperatures. You wrap the start of the link, solder it, manage your route on the comb (optional but recommended), wrap around the next pin, solder that, and repeat until you get to the end of the run. Makes things like address or data busses a doddle. I used it very successfully in the past and it's a lot cheaper than wire-wrap - and it can make equally dense circuits without requiring special sockets (or indeed, any sockets at all, if you're confident!)
Neil
Re: shopping list
I remember used something like verowire when I was teenager tinkering with electronics. It was thin wire with special enamel that melt when heated with solder gun. I can't find verowire seller here in USA. Maybe I can find the 50-year old spool of wire somewhere in my garage...
Bill
Bill
Re: shopping list
I think Vero is a trademark, so perhaps search for "solderable enamel wire" or "wiring pencil" and see which keywords lurk close by.
Roadrunner is a similar trademark, and I see they sell "wire distribution strips" which is the kind of plastic comb that's handy for wire management.
Roadrunner is a similar trademark, and I see they sell "wire distribution strips" which is the kind of plastic comb that's handy for wire management.
Quote:
Wire Distribution Strips in UK – also referred to as Roadrunner® Strips, castellated strips, wiring combes, wiring pen combes, wiring channels, or wiring guides, are used to route and support the wiring in position
- GARTHWILSON
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: 30 Aug 2002
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: shopping list
BigEd wrote:
I think Vero is a trademark, so perhaps search for "solderable enamel wire" or "wiring pencil" and see which keywords lurk close by.
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Re: shopping list
Vero are probably most famous for veroboard: 0.1" centre holes with parallel copper strips joining them. And perhaps also for some of the best 19" rack mounting systems at the time... they still do both, but I feel their prices are, um, less than competitive.
Roadrunner used a special PCB with little turrets on the bottom side; a matching socket at each point on the top side and IDC gaps in the turrets. That just pushed the wire into the IDC slot, very fast to make, but the boards were stupid expensive.
Though I now note that Roadrunner is still going strong, but now offering wiring pencils similar to verowire (and somewhat cheaper): https://roadrunnerelectronics.com/wirin ... ring-pens/ The wiring guides they offer are twice the price of the verowire combs (but available in smaller quantities)
Neil
Roadrunner used a special PCB with little turrets on the bottom side; a matching socket at each point on the top side and IDC gaps in the turrets. That just pushed the wire into the IDC slot, very fast to make, but the boards were stupid expensive.
Though I now note that Roadrunner is still going strong, but now offering wiring pencils similar to verowire (and somewhat cheaper): https://roadrunnerelectronics.com/wirin ... ring-pens/ The wiring guides they offer are twice the price of the verowire combs (but available in smaller quantities)
Neil
Re: shopping list
barnacle wrote:
It's an enameled wire which melts its enamel at soldering temperatures. You wrap the start of the link, solder it, manage your route on the comb (optional but recommended), wrap around the next pin, solder that, and repeat until you get to the end of the run. Makes things like address or data busses a doddle. I used it very successfully in the past and it's a lot cheaper than wire-wrap - and it can make equally dense circuits without requiring special sockets (or indeed, any sockets at all, if you're confident!)
Neil
Neil
"The key is not to let the hardware sense any fear." - Radical Brad
Re: shopping list
Wow .. sage advice from such an experienced group. Thanks all ... had no idea a "simple" question would get into such detail ... but I love it.
Yes, my original question was about solderless breadboards
Being new at this (and maybe foolish), looking for some quick fun, I'd have to characterize my initial interest between "experiments", all digital, cost conscience, "1mhz", and convenience. I'm also planning to play with a Pi Pico trying to interface to existing 6502. The examples I'm studying have low part count ... and I can practice keeping everything short. I'd like to get to simple PCB production but have a bunch of learning to do.
Yes, my original question was about solderless breadboards
Being new at this (and maybe foolish), looking for some quick fun, I'd have to characterize my initial interest between "experiments", all digital, cost conscience, "1mhz", and convenience. I'm also planning to play with a Pi Pico trying to interface to existing 6502. The examples I'm studying have low part count ... and I can practice keeping everything short. I'd like to get to simple PCB production but have a bunch of learning to do.
Re: shopping list
If you do decide to use soldered breadboards, you are welcome to the gerbers for the one I recently designed here: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7910
Neil
Neil