6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:44 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:00 am
Posts: 2353
Location: Gouda, The Netherlands
BigEd wrote:
In more concrete news, I tried to fit Arlet's core (the smallest) to CoolrunnerII, and it failed to fit the largest CPLD: 577 macrocells needed versus 512 available. Not missing by an enormous margin, but missing.


I assume you tried the old core without BCD support. Correct ?

Ah, I see you already said that you tried the smallest. Never mind.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10834
Location: England
ah, actually no, I merely meant that yours is the smallest of the collection of cores. We can indeed lose a bit with BCD and a bit by losing RDY. (But not much.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: NC, USA
If I may interject, I thought I was able to fit one of the cores (I thought it was Arlet's) into a Xilinx 208-pin CPLD...

I searched this forum, but could not find the post I'm referring to. But I would've sworn that I'd posted it somewhere on this forum.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10834
Location: England
Just checked - looks like the largest CPLDs are very expensive (£40, and that's only 384 macrocells). So if the advantage is the 5v tolerance, it would have to be very important. (Smaller CPLDs are a different matter, but for a super fast 6502 part it seems to me that a small Spartan 3AN at £7 makes more sense.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10834
Location: England
I see Oleg Odintsov has posted a new core:
http://opencores.org/project,ag_6502
It's unusual in being phase accurate, a relatively compact implementation but coded in some High level source compiled to verilog.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10834
Location: England
Also Ian Chapman posted a core back in late 2010
http://opencores.org/project,lattice6502
which is not intended to be cycle accurate but to take fewest clock cycles per instruction.

From the source:
---- I will make it run as fast as I can. Timing not per a real 6502.
---- Lattice EBI has clocked address inputs, so as not to add a cycle
---- 6502 address outputs are not latched. The data output of the EBI ROM and
---- RAM is not clocked.
---- To maintain speed the 6502 address to ROM/RAM is not clocked and the data
---- returned is not clocked by ROM/RAM. Structures of form address <= address + "1";
---- cause a race condition. I had to store the address from the mux for
---- INC type instructions ie read then write.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:08 pm
Posts: 1014
Location: near Heidelberg, Germany
I think you finally may add the 65k core to the list of available cores :-)

http://www.6502.org/users/andre/65k/index.html

André

_________________
Author of the GeckOS multitasking operating system, the usb65 stack, designer of the Micro-PET and many more 6502 content: http://6502.org/users/andre/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: NC, USA
So it is a fully functional 6502 core as well? I can add it in a couple days. Thanks!

_________________
65Org16:https://github.com/ElEctric-EyE/verilog-6502


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:08 pm
Posts: 1014
Location: near Heidelberg, Germany
ElEctric_EyE wrote:
So it is a fully functional 6502 core as well? I can add it in a couple days. Thanks!


It's binary compatible, but of course adds my extensions. It's huge though - extensions were more of a goal than code/silicon size.
Still kind of alpha though.

André

_________________
Author of the GeckOS multitasking operating system, the usb65 stack, designer of the Micro-PET and many more 6502 content: http://6502.org/users/andre/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:38 am
Posts: 2
Location: Moscow
BigEd wrote:
I see Oleg Odintsov has posted a new core:
http://opencores.org/project,ag_6502
It's unusual in being phase accurate, a relatively compact implementation but coded in some High level source compiled to verilog.


Hello everyone! At present, I am testing my new core and preparing documentation for both compiler and core. So if you found some mistakes or improper behaviour of the core, please send me a bug report.

Latest version of the core stably works at 10 MHz (using 50 MHz clock source for phase shift and delays). I was trying to increase it's speed by using DCM to multiply clock source to 200 MHz thus enabling to increase cpu speed to 40 MHz, but it doesn't works in my Spartan 3E (even if I was using 1 MHz clock source with 200 MHz phase shift). Did anybody happened to do this on Spartan family of FPGA?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10834
Location: England
Welcome Oleg!
I can't answer your question, but I'm sure someone can.
This is presumably your system: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOFKD8A-syU
Cheers
Ed


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:38 am
Posts: 2
Location: Moscow
BigEd wrote:
Welcome Oleg!
This is presumably your system: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOFKD8A-syU


Yes, those videos tagged with "agat-7" are mine.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: NC, USA
Oleg, welcome to the Forum!
Another one bitten by the 6502 'speed bug' :D

_________________
65Org16:https://github.com/ElEctric-EyE/verilog-6502


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: NC, USA
Rob Finch has a new website. I will update the link in the original post.... Thanks for Dr. Jeff alerting me. I see Rob has contributed to 6502.org's sister site. Welcome back!

I'm thinking of re-doing this thread but doing the comparisons around a Spartan 6 device, since we have some new additions like Oleg and MichaelM's softcore. I know I've said it before, but tomorrow I will start on the new thread, with pics as attachments. Hopefully 6502.org Admin will not have a problem with this. The service Photobucket, which I used to use has changed too much to be useful.

_________________
65Org16:https://github.com/ElEctric-EyE/verilog-6502


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 3258
Location: NC, USA
Also, Mike J. has a recent update on his fpgaarcade site just this month, after almost a year delay.

_________________
65Org16:https://github.com/ElEctric-EyE/verilog-6502


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: