Removed by author

With only absolute addressing, you would not be able to pass arguments on the stack anyway.

Removed by author

If you permit self modifying code, you could build your own data stack in data memory, and then you wouldn't need TSX/TXS at all.

The thing to bear in mind about this topic

is that it always is going to be a tradeoff, landing somewhere in between a very-nearly-6502 and a single instruction tarpit.

(Each of us will be inclined to place that tradeoff at a different place. It's all very interesting, but not a good basis to argue over.)

Removed by author

Removed by author

No, that was my point. You can start the stack at any random point, and it will just wrap around the page boundary, giving you 256 usable bytes.

Removed by author

But you can set the stack pointer to 0x1ff (well, 0xff) at reset, through hardware. Doesn't need a dedicated instruction unless you're going to get exciting in the program.

Neil

Removed by author

Well I'm kind of assuming you're emulating|designing|building a complete but minimal processor here, so it would seem that it's just a question of setting a register as part of the reset initialisation: to get the initial reset vector you have to jam the $fffc address onto the bus and then increment it after reading the value into the address register low and high. I don't know what mechanism you would choose to do that, but one could (e.g.)
- tick 0, issue a reset to a register counter
- tick 1, issue a decrement to it
and I feel these could happen in parallel with other required operations for the reset so wouldn't occupy any more time/ticks.

Neil