6502.org Forum Projects Code Documents Tools Forum
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:56 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Hardware

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 1:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Oh my, looky what we have here!

Sent the designs off day after Christmas and received them back today. It took them longer than normal probably because of the holidays and 3 of them are 4-layer boards. One of them is even gold plated (ENIG). Five of these boards are 6502 or 65816 related. Two of them are accelerators for Apple II, my latest distraction. So, it will be "Fun fun fun 'til mommy takes the soldering gun away" :P
Bill


Attachments:
DSC_67260105.jpg
DSC_67260105.jpg [ 1.12 MiB | Viewed 3593 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
sburrow
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2021 11:21 am
Posts: 718
Location: Texas
Lookin' good!

On the top-middle and bottom-right, you have some very serious surface-mount chips, like a bazillion tiny pins! How DO you solder those things on??? L33t hax0r skills? :)

(Seriously, I'd like to know.)

Chad
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
barrym95838
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:26 pm
Posts: 1950
Location: Sacramento, CA, USA
You have a white cat helping you with your projects, don't you?

Attachment:
helper.PNG
helper.PNG [ 287.37 KiB | Viewed 3586 times ]


Hermione likes to help us around the house too.

Attachment:
20211220_225318.jpg
20211220_225318.jpg [ 1.28 MiB | Viewed 3585 times ]

_________________
Got a kilobyte lying fallow in your 65xx's memory map? Sprinkle some VTL02C on it and see how it grows on you!

Mike B. (about me) (learning how to github)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
sburrow wrote:
Lookin' good!

On the top-middle and bottom-right, you have some very serious surface-mount chips, like a bazillion tiny pins! How DO you solder those things on??? L33t hax0r skills? :)

(Seriously, I'd like to know.)

Chad

The top middle is Altera EPM7192SQC160, 160-pin quad flat pack. Bottom right is EPM7128SQC100, 100-pin QFP. These are hand soldered, one pin at a time, under microscope. Need practices to master it. The secret is small-tipped soldering iron, small diameter solder, flux, and magnifier.

barrym95838 wrote:
You have a white cat helping you with your projects, don't you?

I have two white dogs (Westie), but I think that's just old age. Well, at least I still have some hairs left... :roll:

Bill
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
GARTHWILSON
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8546
Location: Southern California
sburrow wrote:
On the top-middle and bottom-right, you have some very serious surface-mount chips, like a bazillion tiny pins! How DO you solder those things on??? L33t hax0r skills? :)

You don't solder one pin at a time. I soldered the SOJ's in the second picture of BDD's post here with a 1/8" chisel tip that covers three pins at once. I don't even use extra flux. Somewhere we have a topic about soldering finer-pitched stuff with different techniques. Maybe someone else can remember appropriate search terms better than I seem to be able to.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Yes, drag soldering works as well. I had an assembler whom I worked with for 20+ years. She took her time soldering the 4 corners and then drag solder each side in few seconds. Amazingly fast.
Bill
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Since we are talking about it, I want to solder one up to check out the new QFP160 footprint. The old footprint had some misalignment and the landing area for the solder tip is too narrow. Now I have soldered one up, I'm happy with the footprint. Something I've learned over the years is that footprint for hand soldering is different than machine soldered footprint. The standard library footprints are for machine soldering and need to be modified for hand assembly.
Bill


Attachments:
0DSC_67270105.jpg
0DSC_67270105.jpg [ 1.13 MiB | Viewed 3567 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
plasmo wrote:
Since we are talking about it, I want to solder one up to check out the new QFP160 footprint. The old footprint had some misalignment and the landing area for the solder tip is too narrow. Now I have soldered one up, I'm happy with the footprint. Something I've learned over the years is that footprint for hand soldering is different than machine soldered footprint. The standard library footprints are for machine soldering and need to be modified for hand assembly.
Bill

Looking at your board reminds me of a time when 90 degree corners in traces were an invitation to disaster. What would happen is the etching solution would sneak under the photo-resist and eat more copper off the sharp, outside corner than the inside corner, thinning out the trace. Eventually some such traces would open up.

When I was taught how to design PCBs (many years ago), I was admonished to use two closely-spaced 45 degree corners to avoid the thin trace problem (I still do this out of habit). Fortunately, processes have improved since then. Even so, some board houses still caution against using 90 degree bends on trace widths under 10 mils.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
The "no 90 degree acid trap" prohibition was a valid concern in the last century, but not an issue anymore. You can verify that by zooming in the image and see the corners of 7 mil traces are not over-etched. Having said that, I also know I can open up 100 modern electronics and find no 90 degree corner in any of the 100 pc boards. It is a rule that every board designer follow (except a few black sheep). It is like the "must wearing jacket in fancy restaurants" rule that everyone just follow.
Bill
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
AndrewP
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 11:52 am
Posts: 287
Location: South Africa
Live and learn. I'd always been told 90° bends could cause single integrity problems. I had no idea it was actually an old manufacturing process issue. In fairness I might have been told this by a radio astronomer as the department I was with had strong ties with the Hartebeesthoek Radio Telescope.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
plasmo
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1120
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
AndrewP wrote:
Live and learn. I'd always been told 90° bends could cause single integrity problems. I had no idea it was actually an old manufacturing process issue. In fairness I might have been told this by a radio astronomer as the department I was with had strong ties with the Hartebeesthoek Radio Telescope.

It definitely is a signal integrity issue above multiple hundreds of megahertz. Thankfully we don't have to worry about that in the retro community.
Bill
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
plasmo wrote:
The "no 90 degree acid trap" prohibition was a valid concern in the last century, but not an issue anymore.

As I noted...processes have greatly improved.

Quote:
...I also know I can open up 100 modern electronics and find no 90 degree corner in any of the 100 pc boards. It is a rule that every board designer follow (except a few black sheep). It is like the "must wearing jacket in fancy restaurants" rule that everyone just follow.

And there are restaurants that won't admit you unless you are wearing a jacket and in some cases, a tie. I and some clients once got kicked out of such a restaurant in San Diego in the 1970s. Too bad the Internet and Yelp weren't around back then. I would have been merciless. :D

Quote:
AndrewP wrote:
Live and learn. I'd always been told 90° bends could cause single integrity problems. I had no idea it was actually an old manufacturing process issue. In fairness I might have been told this by a radio astronomer as the department I was with had strong ties with the Hartebeesthoek Radio Telescope.

It definitely is a signal integrity issue above multiple hundreds of megahertz. Thankfully we don't have to worry about that in the retro community.
Bill

Be sure to let us know when you get your 65C02 project running over 100 MHz. :D

BTW, I recall reading somewhere sometime ago that Bill Mensch had opined that if the processes used to make the cores of AMD's Opteron processors were used to produce the 65C02's core it would likely be capable of 10 GHz. What fun would that be! :shock:

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
GARTHWILSON
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8546
Location: Southern California
plasmo wrote:
AndrewP wrote:
Live and learn. I'd always been told 90° bends could cause single integrity problems. I had no idea it was actually an old manufacturing process issue. In fairness I might have been told this by a radio astronomer as the department I was with had strong ties with the Hartebeesthoek Radio Telescope.

It definitely is a signal integrity issue above multiple hundreds of megahertz. Thankfully we don't have to worry about that in the retro community.
Bill

Please see what Dr. Howard Johnson writes in his article, "Who's Afraid of the Big, Band Bend?" at https://web.archive.org/web/20110910025 ... adbend.htm, first published in EDN magazine, May 2000 which is where I first saw it. Even in the fastest digital work, the 90° bends on small traces absolutely do not present a performance problem.

Decades ago when I was etching my own boards with ferric chloride from Radio Shack, I found that the insides of sharp corners would corrode, from not rinsing all the etchant out. I started really scrubbing the boards after etching, the soaking longer and scrubbing some more, trying to get the etchant all out; but try as I may, all it did was make it take longer to develop enough corrosion to see. It still appeared after a while though. So after I started laying out boards to be made commercially in the mid-1980's, I avoided the sharp corners. It's not necessary anymore, but it doesn't cost me a thing to keep doing it.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 5:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
GARTHWILSON wrote:
Please see what Dr. Howard Johnson writes in his article, "Who's Afraid of the Big, Band Bend?" at https://web.archive.org/web/20110910025 ... adbend.htm, first published in EDN magazine, May 2000 which is where I first saw it. Even in the fastest digital work, the 90° bends on small traces absolutely do not present a performance problem.

For the benefit of anyone who isn’t familiar with Dr. Johnson, when it comes to high-speed digital design, he is an expert among experts. If he says a sharp corner won't affect signal propagation in a meaningful way you can take it to the bank.

Quote:
So after I started laying out boards to be made commercially in the mid-1980's, I avoided the sharp corners. It's not necessary anymore, but it doesn't cost me a thing to keep doing it.

I continue to use two 45s instead of one 90. Although the reason for it has pretty much disappeared with modern processes, old habits die hard. BTW, I still use wide greenbar paper in my Oki ML395 printer. While the old 395 (I've had it for 25 years, and it was a refurb when I bought it) can't match the speed of a laser, it and the wide paper are the cat’s meow for dumping program listings.

Incidentally, here’s the layout for a controller PCB I designed for use in a riding-scale locomotive. It’s a four-layer design and is about 10 inches (25.4mm) wide. Note the absence of 90 degree bends in the traces...old habits die hard. :D

Attachment:
File comment: Riding-Scale Locomotive Controller
controls.gif
controls.gif [ 112.63 KiB | Viewed 3438 times ]

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigEd
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10986
Location: England
I like diagonal routing too, but for a different reason: you can get more in. In BDD's example above, there are three traces on the lower right which weave between a via and a fixing hole. Along the lower edge there are four parallel traces which need to jog inboard as they go left. In both cases, being restricted to right angles will use up a lot more room.

(Inmos' CAS system used an octagonal system for routing in their transputer family chips, and it was great to use!)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 3
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Hardware

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
6502.org is an ongoing project by Mike Naberezny and contributors.