6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:58 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:41 am
Posts: 442
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
You can run any intel hex object code on the simulator! Just assemble with your favourite assembler (with the macros you want) and load the object code into the simulator.

_________________
6502 sources on GitHub: https://github.com/Klaus2m5


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
Klaus2m5 wrote:
You can run any intel hex object code on the simulator! Just assemble with your favourite assembler (with the macros you want) and load the object code into the simulator.

Also, Motorola S-record or raw binary. I use S-record to transfer object code from the Kowalski assembler to my POC units for testing. I use the raw binary output for burning EPROMs.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
8BIT wrote:
I've been searching through the forum for bugs/feature requests/etc with the Kowalski Simulator and found this. Can you describe the purpose and use of the .PARAMTYPE feature?

I will post a consolidated list of bugs and feature requests once its completed.

I almost forgot about one "bug" (whether or not it is a real bug is probably more a matter of opinion than anything else) but was reminded of it by a post by Klaus on loading code into the simulator.

The Kowalski assembler's Motorola S-record output only generates S1 and S9 records. While those two record types are sufficient to transfer object code to another system, some applications may require S0 and S5 records. For example, the software for the well-known TOPS programmers will accept an S-record file, but not the Kowalski version, as it lacks the S0 and S5 records.

Dunno how much a task it would be to add those two records.

Attachment:
File comment: Motorola S-Record Format
motorola_s_record.pdf [28.82 KiB]
Downloaded 176 times

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 365
Klaus2m5 wrote:
You can run any intel hex object code on the simulator!
Right. That works pretty well but you lose all your label and macro names. It's not the end of the world but it does make it a bit hard to follow. Maybe I'm spoiled from my old setup where I ran CA65 list files through a program that ran them on a real 6502 over USB :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: