6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:10 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:29 am
Posts: 597
Location: Norway/Japan
Switzerland drives on the right.

-Tor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
Tor wrote:
Switzerland drives on the right.

-Tor

But they run trains on the left. Seems logical! :shock:

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: England
I've noticed that planes board on the left, as if they too drive on the left. It seems only natural to me!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
BigEd wrote:
I've noticed that planes board on the left, as if they too drive on the left. It seems only natural to me!

Well, the captain does sit on the left side of the cockpit. It gets more confusing if the first officer is flying the plane.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: England
Interesting!
Quote:
At the end of the World War I, most fighter aircraft were designed and fitted with rotary engines. When it came to steering these rotary-engine aircraft, turning to the left was easier because it followed the torque of the engine, whereas turning to the right was harder, as it was against the torque (twisting) forces. Hence, it would require more rudder movement to compensate for the forces. Because of this, pilots chose to turn left as a more convenient manoeuvre and thus, most traffic patterns in the air around airfields involved mainly left turns.

When bigger planes were designed with side-to-side seating, the co-pilot was made to sit on the right. The left-hand seat was made exclusively for the captain. It comes with complete flight instruments and controls. This seat also afforded better visibility with the assumption that more frequent left turns are made during the flight.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2015 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
BigEd wrote:
Interesting!
Quote:
At the end of the World War I, most fighter aircraft were designed and fitted with rotary engines. When it came to steering these rotary-engine aircraft, turning to the left was easier because it followed the torque of the engine, whereas turning to the right was harder, as it was against the torque (twisting) forces. Hence, it would require more rudder movement to compensate for the forces.

Adding insult to injury with the rotary engines, which had a lot of flywheel mass due to the rotating crankcase and cylinder assembly, making too abrupt a turn would overstress the airframe due to gyroscopic effects, and the engine and propeller assembly would break off. The sudden change in the aircraft's center-of-gravity would cause it to violently pitch up, go into a stall and crash. Very few pilots managed to regain control in time to do anything other than auger in.

Engine torque is still a factor in today's reciprocating aircraft, especially during takeoff, but more manageable due to better flight controls.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 149
Location: Chexbres, VD, Switzerland
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
But they run trains on the left. Seems logical! :shock:

I don't see any reason why trains should drive on the same side as road vehicles, since they use completely separate medium of transportations. By the way cable cars runs sometimes on either side, by the way, and some types of them such as funiculars alternate their direction of running every time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: England
Good point about funiculars - I hadn't thought of that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: England
Apparently French trains mostly drive on the left, but German trains on the right:
Quote:
In most countries, the “rule of the road” for trains is the same as for road traffic. For example, in England, where cars drive on the left of the road, trains run on the left hand of a pair of rail tracks, while in Germany, where cars drive on the right, trains use the right hand track of the pair. France is an exception to this rule. Cars drive on the right, but trains run on the left. This is because the early railways were mainly built using British expertise and standard equipment “out of the box”. No major operational problems are caused by this discrepancy, but it did give rise to an oddity: between the end of Franco-Prussian war of 1871 and the end of the First World War, the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine formed part of the German Empire, and during this time their lines were converted to right-hand running. When the provinces were returned to France in 1919, right hand running was left in place. To cope with the change from left hand to right hand running at places where there was no necessity to stop for a border crossing, a number of flyovers or sauts de mouton (literally, “sheep jumps”) were installed whose sole purpose was to take one running line over the top of another in the opposite direction.

The Paris Métro also runs on the right; this is believed to be because the first lines, opened at the beginning of the 20th century, were closely based on electric tram technology and operation. Paris trams of course had to run on the right when operating in the streets.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
Look at all the off-topic discussion I started! :lol:

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
Bregalad wrote:
...some types of them such as funiculars alternate their direction of running every time.

Indeed, as the weight of the descending car counterbalances the ascending one.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:04 am
Posts: 155
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Despite all the cool stuff he did around computing I was always impressed that Babbage also invented the cow catcher for the front of locomotives.

Simon

_________________
My 6502 related blog: http://www.asciimation.co.nz/bb/category/6502-computer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10980
Location: England
I really recommend his memoirs - the descent into a volcano is great.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Leaping Forward
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2015 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8491
Location: Midwestern USA
Simon wrote:
Despite all the cool stuff he did around computing I was always impressed that Babbage also invented the cow catcher for the front of locomotives.

Which, despite the name, usually killed cattle, not catch them. :roll:

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: