You probably know most of this stuff, but I'll post it for the benefit of others too.
ElEctric_EyE wrote:
Wasn't the primary advantage of a switching power supply the availability of much more current than a linear power supply?
A primary advantage is efficiency, and that can also mean greater current or smaller size when you don't have to get rid of much heat in the process. Heat sinks take room. In a "buck" configuration that steps the voltage down, the output current may actually be higher than the input current, as it acts kind of like a gear ratio which exchanges torque for speed from one end to the other. Related to that, another advantage is that a switcher can, in a "boost" configuration, be used to step the voltage
up (unlike linear regulators).
Quote:
I started this thread on these switching power regulators because I was impressed at the low parts count for a switching power supply
The parts count for something like a 7805 regulator is hard to beat-- just a .1uF capacitor at the input and one at the output. Integrated switching regulators like I linked to have all the parts on a single hybrid module, relieving you of the design and assembly work.
Quote:
, however the current is not that much above the LDO regulators, only 200mA.
The tiny switcher ICs with integrated switching MOSFETs are pretty limited in current. The ones that can do the higher powers will require external MOSFETs, adding to the parts count and design complexity. They definitely exist though.
Quote:
When I look at the switching power supply I use from an old PC that says 30Amps @5VDC, that's impressive for it's size compared to linear which would require a huge step-down transformer only for 10 Amps.
The PC power supplies start the switching business at the AC mains, instead of first using a step-down transformer and rectifier and smoothing capacitor circuit as a starting point and then regulating. Myself, I have not looked into how to design that kind of thing.
Quote:
The fact that they can allow a greater input voltage is not a reason to use them. I think that's what you were saying when you suggested an LM317.
I'm not sure which way you mean here. The LM317 is an easy solution for situations where:
- the input voltage is in the range of 1.75V to 40V above the desired output voltage, and
- the heat produced by throttling the output to the desired output voltage is acceptable (the operation is basically like dropping the voltage by way of a resistor that is constantly adjusted to give the right output), and
- you have power available to burn, which may exclude battery-powered situations. I have used linear regulators (LP2940 and LP2950) in battery-powered situations where the current used by the regulated load is a small percentage of the overall load on the battery, so using a linear regulator did not impact battery life significantly.
If you can go with a standard output voltage like 5V, 12V, or 15V, the 78xx (or LM340 series which is somewhat improved over the 78xx) family reduces the external parts down to just an input and an output capacitor. For low-power situations, the 78Lxx, LM317L, and LP2950 regulators are available in TO-92 or even smaller packages.
Quote:
Maybe I was impressed on the progress of these devices.
Some consumer items are driven heavily by cost and size (including being as low-power as possible to get the battery size and weight down). The market of the two companies I've worked for since 1985 is different, and although I've benefited from various new parts on the market, it can also be very frustrating finding a fit when so many of the parts are not compatible with legacy equipment we have to interface to in the aircraft. Hobby stuff is a mix, but I realize you're going for the low-voltage FPGA stuff.
For convenient, inexpensive, complete fixed-voltage power supplies, even Jameco has a lot of attractive offerings in wall-wart power supplies with switching regulators in them, and for more power, table-top supplies.