6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sun Oct 06, 2024 7:31 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: SYM-1 cassette interface
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:43 am
Posts: 11
Location: Fremont, CA, USA
Hi everyone,

This is only tangentially 6502 related, I hope you all won't mind my posting it here. I've been looking at the cassette input circuit on the Synertek SYM-1 schematics. Here's the relevant section:

Image

I understand the principle behind the circuit, but I don't understand why the value 100 ohms was chosen for the two resistors in the voltage divider (marked R95 and R126 in the schematic). My understanding is that the 2.5V from this divider serves as a reference voltage on the non-inverting input of the comparator, as well as providing a +2.5V bias to the cassette audio signal on the inverting input, correct? But it seems to me that any resistor values could have been chosen. The 200 ohm resistance between +5V and ground means the circuit is always consuming at least 25 mA, it seems like a higher value would make more sense. So, I assume there's something I'm missing from my understanding :)

I still consider myself a real neophyte when it comes to hardware (I've been a software guy much longer), so I really appreciate it when I can get guidance from experienced folks. It's the best way to learn.

-Twylo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 3367
Location: Ontario, Canada
Quote:
My understanding is that the 2.5V from this divider serves as a reference voltage on the non-inverting input of the comparator, as well as providing a +2.5V bias to the cassette audio signal on the inverting input, correct?
Yes that's right. But that node -- the junction of the 100 ohm resistors -- also connects to the two 1N914 diodes. It looks as if these are intended to clip the input signal arriving via R92. To clip effectively and yet still stay centered around the 2.5V point requires that the node have low impedance as compared with R92 (1K).

You're right in saying it's a waste of power, but it's cheap and it works. A slightly more expensive alternative would be to bypass the node to ground by adding a suitable capacitor (effectively about zero ohms at audio frequencies). Then higher-value resistors could be used in place of the 100 ohm units, reducing power. To be fussy about it, you could put 50 ohms in series with the new cap; then you'd have a closer match to the existing circuit -- roughly 50 ohms at the node in question. At least that's my take on the situation :)

cheers

Jeff

_________________
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html


Last edited by Dr Jefyll on Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 8:41 pm
Posts: 250
Dr Jefyll wrote:
Quote:
My understanding is that the 2.5V from this divider serves as a reference voltage on the non-inverting input of the comparator, as well as providing a +2.5V bias to the cassette audio signal on the inverting input, correct?
Yes that's right. But that node also connects to the two 1N914 diodes. It looks as if these are intended to clip the input signal arriving via R92. To clip effectively and yet still stay centered around the 2.5V point requires that the node have low impedance as compared with R92 (1K).

That's what I thought also, that since it's "aud in" (meaning audio in, I assume)
it's probably not line level and clipping is expected as part of normal operation.

Quote:
You're right in saying it's a waste of power, but it's cheap and it works. A slightly more expensive alternative would be to bypass the node to ground by adding a suitable capacitor. That would provide low AC impedance -- and higher-value resistors could be used in place of the 100 ohm units. At least that's my take on the situation :)

cheers

Jeff


Don't know what sym-1 uses but you'd want some encoding with no DC component for that
(like Manchester encoding)

These days some jelly bean op amp active virtual ground makes more sense I think.
But I'm kind of suprised there isn't a capacitor or two on the resitor divider.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8521
Location: Southern California
Especially since C16 is only .22uF and R92 is 1K, it definitely makes more sense to make R95 and R126 much higher and bypass them with a 10uF capacitor. CR28 and 29 don't do anything to protect the inputs of the comparator. Some comarators and op amps need that but the LM311 can handle a differential voltage of up to +/-30V. Since it's a comparator, the output will clip anyway, so the diodes aren't needed for clipping. The circuit designers at the computer company were apparently pretty weak in analog design.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8414
Location: Midwestern USA
Dr Jefyll wrote:
-- the junction of the 100 ohm resistors -- also connects to the two 1N914 diodes. It looks as if these are intended to clip the input signal arriving via R92. To clip effectively and yet still stay centered around the 2.5V point requires that the node have low impedance as compared with R92 (1K).

That's also how I see it.

GARTHWILSON wrote:
Some comarators and op amps need that but the LM311 can handle a differential voltage of up to +/-30V. Since it's a comparator, the output will clip anyway, so the diodes aren't needed for clipping. The circuit designers at the computer company were apparently pretty weak in analog design.

It's true that the comparator will clip its output, but you did miss this little caveat on page 4 of the LM311's data sheet:

    3. The magnitude of the input voltage must never exceed the magnitude of the supply voltage or ±15 V, whichever is less.

That explains the clamping circuit. It's there to prevent the inputs from being overdriven.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8521
Location: Southern California
Quote:
3. The magnitude of the input voltage must never exceed the magnitude of the supply voltage or ±15 V, whichever is less.

Then the diodes should go to power and ground, because it doesn't do any good to have them both go above or below together.

R93 will keep the inverting input's signal centered on 2.5V.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Brighton, England
GARTHWILSON wrote:
Quote:
3. The magnitude of the input voltage must never exceed the magnitude of the supply voltage or ±15 V, whichever is less.

Then the diodes should go to power and ground, because it doesn't do any good to have them both go above or below together.

R93 will keep the inverting input's signal centered on 2.5V.


If the diodes went to the power supply rails, the input voltage would exceed the power supply voltage by a diode drop before the diodes started clipping. This would take the LM311 outside its design limits and possibly cause it to be damaged. By clipping to a mid-rail voltage, the LM311 input doesn't get overdriven.

I'm surprised at how low all the resistor values are in this circuit. It would work just as well if all the resistors were made 10 times as large and a capacitor used to decouple pin 2 of the LM311 (say 10uF or 22uF)

_________________
Shift to the left,
Shift to the right,
Mask in, Mask Out,
BYTE! BYTE! BYTE!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8521
Location: Southern California
PaulF wrote:
If the diodes went to the power supply rails, the input voltage would exceed the power supply voltage by a diode drop before the diodes started clipping. This would take the LM311 outside its design limits and possibly cause it to be damaged. By clipping to a mid-rail voltage, the LM311 input doesn't get overdriven.

The diodes should be Schottky ones, so even if parasitic or protection diodes in the IC get some forward voltage, it won't be enough to hurt anything. If there's any doubt, series resistors can be added to pins 2 & 3 with optionally a 22pF capacitor across each of those two resistor to eliminate the pole formed by the resistor and the input capacitance of the IC.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: