6502.org Forum Projects Code Documents Tools Forum
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:28 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Emulation and Simulation

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 4 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
gregorio
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 5:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:27 pm
Posts: 49
As part of further testing of my simulator on STM32, I compiled from the source code SuperMon 816. The program starts and does not suspend, unfortunately some functions, e.g. A or M, do not work correctly.
So I decided to start the Supermon under the control of the Kowalski simulator and it turns out that the same deserves exactly the same bad results. What can the reason be?
The changes I made are added at the end of the source file, in addition I exchanged WAI orders to NOP, and set the vectors.
Attachment:
File comment: stm32 simulatro
Screenshot (232).png
Screenshot (232).png [ 59.33 KiB | Viewed 109 times ]

Attachment:
File comment: Kowalski Simulator
Screenshot (231).png
Screenshot (231).png [ 110.74 KiB | Viewed 109 times ]


Attachments:
File comment: SuperMon816 source code with my changes
supermon816c.zip [38.85 KiB]
Downloaded 5 times
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8505
Location: Midwestern USA
gregorio wrote:
As part of further testing of my simulator on STM32, I compiled from the source code SuperMon 816. The program starts and does not suspend, unfortunately some functions, e.g. A or M, do not work correctly.
So I decided to start the Supermon under the control of the Kowalski simulator and it turns out that the same deserves exactly the same bad results. What can the reason be?
The changes I made are added at the end of the source file, in addition I exchanged WAI orders to NOP, and set the vectors.

I’d expect with the stack pointer (SP) set to $FFFF you would experience problems ($FFFF is the default in the source code—you evidently didn’t edit that).  Try lowering SP to somewhere outside of the 65C816 hardware vector space and see what happens—setting SP to $CFFF is a good start.  Note that the software is designed to run on actual 65C816-powered hardware.  Supermon 816 has not been tested in a simulated environment.

The version of Supermon816 you are using assumes that your console understands a subset of the VT100/ANSI/ECM48 display control sequences.  If you read through the source code (which you “assembled,” not “compiled”—those words mean two different things), you will see where the VT100-style control sequences are defined.  They will produce bizarre effects on your display if it doesn’t implement a VT100-style console.

Included with the Supermon 816 source code posted at my website is a PDF that goes into some detail on adapting the software to different systems, as well as describing the software’s usage.  If you haven’t read that PDF, you should.  :D

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
gregorio
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:27 pm
Posts: 49
Thank you for the link to the page. In the meantime, I found a solution to the malfunction. I downloaded the source file from some github specifically for Kowalski Simulator and found an error in proc. getbyte. I see that the error is already corrected in the source file on your page ( 2023/08/14 A) Corrected an inadvertent coding error in the GETBYTE sub-
; routine )

I am attaching the file that works for Kowalski Simulator


Attachments:
File comment: SuperMon816 with Kowalski Simulator
supermon816c_3.zip [42.85 KiB]
Downloaded 5 times
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2024 3:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8505
Location: Midwestern USA
gregorio wrote:
I am attaching the file that works for Kowalski Simulator

You should be able to assemble the latest version (V1.1.3) to run in the simulator.  It has some minor edits that improve performance in a few areas.  I didn’t document the edits, since they don’t affect function.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 4 posts ] 

Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Emulation and Simulation

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
6502.org is an ongoing project by Mike Naberezny and contributors.