GARTHWILSON on Fri 27 May 2022 wrote:
Spammers often think they have to write just one, or at most, a few, on-topic posts to get through some sort of perceived "probation period," after which they won't be watched anymore and they can do their damage; but not knowing the field, they copy others' posts in order to look legitimate.
I recall some bunkum about angel numbers where a
message about astrology segued into a reference to an Atmel data-sheet. Regulars of the 6502 Forum will know that WDC data-sheets are more closely associated with astrology.
(Only joking. I quite like the WDC data-sheets.)
BigEd on Fri 27 May 2022 wrote:
I feel there's a confusion here between what an account does and what a person is like.
The historical owner of an account may not be the current owner. This may or may not be intentional. However, if an account plagiarizes from the outset then that is bad intent.
I've noticed a rising tide of spam and I believe that it has grown by approximately 1/3 over the last five years. We should count ourselves as fortunate because many websites have the problem that legitimate users are the minority. I believe this is called "The Inversion". To avert such a scenario, we have one last, desperate option which is not available in the general case. We discuss Turing complete electronic systems. Therefore, if spam gets really bad, we could instigate bytecode challenge/response running on Mike Naberezny's Py65 or physical tokens. Unfortunately, this would discourage a large proportion of newbies. However, it would definitely discourage one message "drive by spamming".