HansO wrote:
I like what I see. sounds familiar, for nostalgia I play with the 6502 like you do. Simple, oldfashioned systems, just for fun to get something working.
You may find that not all 6502 forum users are setting their targets that low. Some will warn you not to use old NMOS 6502 and prefer the uptodate WDC65c02 at as high the clock speed can get combined with FPGA and other modern programmable IC's. That often requires careful PCB design, whole new skills beyond the 6502 and lots of experience in finding timing errors.
. Dont let that discourage going on with your projects. The old 65(c)02 is so easy to work with, at 1 MHz you can get away with nearly anything and get something working and have fun.
The second SBC, withoout ROM reminds me of the OSI300. I once made a copy of that one, a pain to progam, but fun to have a really barebone system.
Hi Hans, thanks for reading.
That's what I find somewhat strange about myself, these old computers and processors elicit that sort of nostalgia. The state of the art when I was born was PPC 601 and Pentium Pro, of which I can very little about. I've convinced myself it's because I'm able to (sort of) understand the functioning on a very low level, a rather impossible task today. If nothing else, they're just plain
cool.I fully understand the disadvantages of running NMOS, but that is the processor that really started the computer revolution, and is in some of my favorites from the time. I'm not interested in high speed, minimal power consumption or potential commercial use, so I'm happy using what I have. Plus, undocumented op codes are a mysterious little adventure. Not to mention most of my chips are pulls from the late 70's, so they all play well together. The WDC chips look nice for the easy DMA application, and I have several Rockwell 6503/65c02, so who know. All part of the fun, and what I can find cheaply.
As for using programmable logic, I remember looking at a cheap Performa Mac motherboard, with its one cpu and three VLSI chips and thinking, this isn't a computer. I know how useful they are, but again, it takes away from the purity of the computer, and why I'm building it, to use super fast comparative supercomputers to support the cpu. Not to mention, it also makes it very hard to understand for newcomers, which is the reason I got into the 6502 anyway.
I couldn't find the OSI300 with a quick search, but it sounds familiar. How did it do DMA? I'd love to be able to do it with the NMOS CPU without a bunch of drivers.
Thanks again for the words of support, hopefully this time I'll get something actually working
_________________
Adventures with the 6502 - Simple 6502 computer projects from a high schooler