Dr Jefyll wrote:
Do CBM-II applications use illegal instructions?!
Still curious about this point. If we don't need to preserve the illegal op's then the '816 may be better than an '02 in regard to creating a 6509 substitute using add-on logic.
Steve, is your Rogers email working properly? I haven't heard back from a msg I sent you on Friday. Maybe you're just enjoying the holiday...
Holidays have been crazy... Sorry, I seemed to have missed your email.
Things have settled down now, thankfully.
Btw, I'd be surprised if any cbmii software used illegal opcodes, simply because there's so little software for the machines.