6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Mon Jun 17, 2024 5:15 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10828
Location: England
I'd suggest that WDC own only the mask copyright for the particular 65c02 chips they've made. Just possibly they have patents, but I doubt it. And there's no trademark question. So, I'd say anyone can freely make a 65c02, either exactly like WDC's or a variation on it, as they see fit - so long as they don't try to pass it off or use WDC's name. (You could even copy the mask design by examining a WDC chip, so long as it's at least 10 years old.)

Edit (much later): as this is my first post in this thread, I'm going to use it to dump some recovered text from posts now deleted, posted by the OP, Giebels2609. Perhaps see also these archived pages: 1, 4.

Of course these quotes lack some context, but still I think worth preserving.

Quote:
For the first year or more i'm only going to produce NMOS-chips like back in the old day (equipment is from the 80s ^^)
I dont't think ill produce a faster version of the 6502 (i have no idea how to design a chip)
Nope, no microcontrollers.
Maybe build some new chips... There are still enough numbers left in 65xx.


Quote:
I know... Therefore I'm going to produce rebuilds of commodore computers and produce all chips for them...
Second I will produce ROM, RAM and things of that nature


Quote:
Don't know i'll have to find a good program for cpudesign first... I think i'll use quartus


Quote:
I'm using Electric VSLI

I dont want/will produce wdc replicas... "My" 6502 will be a excact replica of the original 6502 (MOS)


Quote:
Again as I said, I'm going to use mostly machinery that was available at the time... Except for cleaning and stuff... Todays machines are much easier to use...

And it isnt that difficult... just decap a chip of your desire and photograph its DIE (microscope)
then etch away one layer at a time and figure out what belongs in each layer...

The rest is just a process off manufacturing new masks...

EDIT:

I researched a lot in the past days and figured, that it is at this point almost impossible to find equipment from the 70s and 80s...

I guess I'll have to let someone build new machines...
(I have a company in the village [yes, village - not city - 415 people ] that will do this)

So it will be cheaper than doing it somewhere else (and less money fpor transportation)

Anyway... Now I will have to design machines that can do such stuff :(
The first time my studies in Mechanicla Engineering could pay off (I still hate the job)


Quote:
Well, I called a couple of used machine dealers (semiconductor) and I searched a lot on google... It is easy to find stuff from '95 to 2005 but before and after that is is either hard to find or f*cking expensive


Last edited by BigEd on Sat May 28, 2022 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 632
Location: Gillies, Ontario, Canada
What is the end market?
Replacement parts for vintage equipment, or to feed a community that wants to explore / re-live the beginnings of the home computer era?

If your goal is replacement parts, then why not invest in some keyboard / case knockoffs for the C64 / VIC20?
There are endless plastic injection hoses in China, and your investment might only be 10k in tooling to run 1000 units.

The MOS chips are easily replicated in HDL now, so they will never die. A C64 keyboard on the other hand, is on borrowed time already.
Those switches will eventually wear, and the print on the keys will fade into oblivion.

Have you done any kind of market study yet?
I would be interested in the results, as I was shocked at how many offered to purchase one of my projects here.
Still getting many emails per week!
Seems there is a market that I would have never expected for the "old tech"!

Brad


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:28 pm
Posts: 59
Maybe including other chips (z80, 68000, etc you might get enough orders to sustain a market.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 632
Location: Gillies, Ontario, Canada
I wonder what the price point would have to be?
The Propeller was a surprise to me when it came out, since it was targeted just to hackers like me.
They considered the market large enough, and I believe they have done more than one batch, so they must have been correct.

"New Old Chips" might be a smaller slice of pie to go after though.
But then again, there are places remaking 57 Chevy parts, and the C64 is also a classic!

A few years ago I actually considered doing a 6502 clone on a Xilinx CPLD (XC2C256), allowing it to clock up to 100Mhz.
The idea included a DIP board, and a supporting DIP mounted 64K of SRAM that could be serially loaded.
If I remember correctly, my total cost for the 6502 board would have been around $20 to make 1000 units.
But would there have been a market? How long would it take to make a 15% margin on the 20K investment?
I guess if you are doing it because you just enjoy it, then it's all good. Money isn't always the end goal.
The "big players" will never care enough to give you any competition. Even the China pirates wouldn't take notice.

Manufacturing anything is a Rich Man's game though. Be prepared.

Brad

EugeneNine wrote:
Maybe including other chips (z80, 68000, etc you might get enough orders to sustain a market.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8215
Location: Midwestern USA
BigEd wrote:
I'd suggest that WDC own only the mask copyright for the particular 65c02 chips they've made. Just possibly they have patents, but I doubt it. And there's no trademark question. So, I'd say anyone can freely make a 65c02, either exactly like WDC's or a variation on it, as they see fit - so long as they don't try to pass it off or use WDC's name. (You could even copy the mask design by examining a WDC chip, so long as it's at least 10 years old.)

You've touched on a murky area. Bill Mensch is a co-inventor listed on the original 6502 patent, but like all patents from that era, it has long expired. The 65C02 design was released in 1978, so any patents on it would have also expired.

The intellectual property involving the 65C02 is another matter. That is covered by copyright, which as you know, extends to beyond the death of the original copyright holder. In theory, it would seem that producing a 65C02 knockoff would violate copyright. Who knows for sure? This sort of thing is what keeps lawyers employed. :D

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 2:25 pm
Posts: 632
Location: Gillies, Ontario, Canada
I wonder if a a chip that can run 6502 instructions would count as a knock off?
If so, how much would have to change?

Remember Ubicom?
They may these amazing PIC8 compatible chips called the SX series.
They ran the PIC instruction set, but would clock up to 100 MHz!
This is what a uC should be, and I jumped fully into these back in the day.
It was like having an 8 bit PIC that would keep up to an FPGA. Great for video stuff.
Anyhow, they didn't get sued by Microchip. They just went extinct.

If someone pressed out a "compatible" 6502 with these features, I would be all over it!...

- Clock speed up to 100MHz.
- Every instruction to be single cycle.
- Flash based 64K memory (yeah - no frickin' ROMs baby!).
- Flash copied to fast internal 64K SRAM on bootup.
- Loading via standard SPI, JTAG, or modern standard.
- Unused Address and Data Lines now become IO.

So listen up Giebels... make my dream 6502, and I will invest in your company big time!
I will offer distribution, advertising, kits, and more publicity than you could ever imagine.
Forget Liberland man, and make me a SUPER-6502!!

Sorry.. I was getting cranked up on what could be done with such a monster 6502.

Brad



BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
BigEd wrote:
I'd suggest that WDC own only the mask copyright for the particular 65c02 chips they've made. Just possibly they have patents, but I doubt it. And there's no trademark question. So, I'd say anyone can freely make a 65c02, either exactly like WDC's or a variation on it, as they see fit - so long as they don't try to pass it off or use WDC's name. (You could even copy the mask design by examining a WDC chip, so long as it's at least 10 years old.)

You've touched on a murky area. Bill Mensch is a co-inventor listed on the original 6502 patent, but like all patents from that era, it has long expired. The 65C02 design was released in 1978, so any patents on it would have also expired.

The intellectual property involving the 65C02 is another matter. That is covered by copyright, which as you know, extends to beyond the death of the original copyright holder. In theory, it would seem that producing a 65C02 knockoff would violate copyright. Who knows for sure? This sort of thing is what keeps lawyers employed. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:28 pm
Posts: 59
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
BigEd wrote:
I'd suggest that WDC own only the mask copyright for the particular 65c02 chips they've made. Just possibly they have patents, but I doubt it. And there's no trademark question. So, I'd say anyone can freely make a 65c02, either exactly like WDC's or a variation on it, as they see fit - so long as they don't try to pass it off or use WDC's name. (You could even copy the mask design by examining a WDC chip, so long as it's at least 10 years old.)

You've touched on a murky area. Bill Mensch is a co-inventor listed on the original 6502 patent, but like all patents from that era, it has long expired. The 65C02 design was released in 1978, so any patents on it would have also expired.

The intellectual property involving the 65C02 is another matter. That is covered by copyright, which as you know, extends to beyond the death of the original copyright holder. In theory, it would seem that producing a 65C02 knockoff would violate copyright. Who knows for sure? This sort of thing is what keeps lawyers employed. :D


Depends on who has the most $. Look at all the prior art copied from Palm's ideas that Apple put into their crappy phones and then sued and won against anyone else who did similar. I had hoped maybe HP would get back in the market when they bought palm and were buying palm to beat Apple.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10828
Location: England
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
The intellectual property involving the 65C02 is another matter. That is covered by copyright, which as you know, extends to beyond the death of the original copyright holder. In theory, it would seem that producing a 65C02 knockoff would violate copyright. Who knows for sure? This sort of thing is what keeps lawyers employed. :D

"Intellectual Property" is a vague term which serves to collect specific protections: patents, trade marks, copyrights, design patents. None of those apply here. It might be a useful personal policy to steer clear of anything which might possibly be problematic, but it's not hard to understand this area if you want to be more precise when discussing it. Of course you'd get legal advice if starting a business, but that's again a different question. There's nothing in WDC's 6502 older chips which could still be copyrighted. (Of course, they do have copyright in their documentation and their tools, but that's a different question.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:27 am
Posts: 672
Just make sure not to call it a "65c02". "6502" _might_ be doable as protecting model numbers isn't really a thing, but still sketchy. "The $MY_CHIP is intended to be compatible to the 65c02. ["65c02" is a trademark of WDC and we have no affiliation or endorsement from them blahblah]" or whatever is typically what you get.

This is the reason Intel went from "80486" to "Pentium", because a name could be trademarked but not a number. This meant AMD and Cyrix couldn't name their chips the same as Intel anymore, as was possible with the "486" or "80486".

_________________
WFDis Interactive 6502 Disassembler
AcheronVM: A Reconfigurable 16-bit Virtual CPU for the 6502 Microprocessor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10828
Location: England
Yes, that's the sort of thing you'd get legal advice on if in business.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:32 pm
Posts: 246
Location: The Kettle Moraine
I may be wrong, but I don't think they would have any right to "65c02", but probably "W65C02".


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:29 am
Posts: 597
Location: Norway/Japan
In any case, the OP said several times that he's looking at the 6502, not the 65C02 (although if it would be NMOS I'm not so sure.. as masks would have to be created from scratch anyway it wouldn't have to be NMOS).
Not sure where the market would be for that though.. I wouldn't buy a 6502, and for a +14MHz 65C02 we have WDC already (and I have enough WDC chips in the drawer to last me for some time).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:28 pm
Posts: 59
The point I was trying to make is be prepared for lots of legal issues, because anyone can sue anyone else for anything and I'm sure re-creating a 6502 could hurt WDC's sales and you may end up in court having to proove you didn't use anything from the C02 that WDC owns.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:27 am
Posts: 672
Of course, given that WDC is fabless and likely sells vastly more units of chip IP than physical processors, and that the OP is not in the same country, there might be little impetus for WDC caring at all.

But it's always good to do your best to pay proper legal respect, instead of pushing the issues.

_________________
WFDis Interactive 6502 Disassembler
AcheronVM: A Reconfigurable 16-bit Virtual CPU for the 6502 Microprocessor


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8459
Location: Southern California
Almost all of WDC's income comes from licensing IP, not from selling actual parts. Their license fees are piddly cheap compared to lawyer costs though, so if there's any risk of conflict, why not just pay it, or at least talk to them. It would cost a teensy fraction as much as manufacturing equipment would. WDC might be glad for anything that promotes even the old 65xx stuff. Kevin did say he wanted to produce the other Commodore ICs too though, which would include the CIA, the VIC, the TED, certain memory (according to his post, although I didn't know Commodore made memories), etc., things that WDC has not been involved with.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: