6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:23 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: W65C02SXB board
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2024 11:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 12:58 pm
Posts: 336
viridi wrote:
I tried to figure it out. Could it be that f: is used for status flags and a: for addresses? Is it some kind of convention? How does the assembler handle this syntax? Or is this source code incomplete?


Look at the listing file. a: forces 16 bit addresses, even for locations that could otherwise be direct page. f: forces 24 bit addresses, even for locations that could otherwise be 16 or 8 bit. They're emitted by the disassembler because the code it's disassembling has operands of those sizes, and (I assume) it's a way to ensure that when you assemble the disassembled code, you get exactly the same binary.

For example, lenhi = 4. If you assemble "sta lenhi" with direct page set to $0000, most assemblers will give you the direct page STA opcode $85. But the binary contains $8D. Saying "sta f:lenhi" forces it to emit the right opcode.

Why does the binary use $8D? My guess is that this code was built in a system that does assembly first, then linking. The addresses of things are only known at link time, so the assembler has to make safe assumptions if the source code doesn't say otherwise. It just knows that lenhi is somewhere in memory, not necessarily in direct page, and must use a 16 bit address for it. (To be truly safe it would have to assume a 24 bit address, but that's a reasonable assumption to make: the few things that end up outside bank 0 can be tagged by the programmer).

That doesn't explain why the same symbol is sometimes tagged with f: and sometimes not. I have no idea on that one.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: W65C02SXB board
PostPosted: Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2024 7:24 am
Posts: 50
Thanks John West, that clears things up. I don't really need all that as I only want to target the 6502 CPU.
I will start simple and try to setup the connection via usb first. I will study the schematic and datasheets and the source code parts involved in making the connection and send and receive data.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigEd and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: