6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:33 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
Cool thanks!

When you say 10% to 90%, do you mean 0.5v to 4.5v in this case? Just to get a better understanding on standard terms.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 2:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
So more like this?
Attachment:
quiz2.png
quiz2.png [ 11.75 KiB | Viewed 574 times ]


I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 2:13 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8544
Location: Southern California
J64C wrote:
So more like this?

Yes.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 2:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
GARTHWILSON wrote:
Yes.

Yes on both fronts of my post? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 12:03 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10986
Location: England
J64C wrote:
I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:

Hee hee - it's a joke of course. But just to be clear, there's no minimum level of competence needed here. There might be a minimum level of willingness-to-learn, of course, which might mean a minimum level of humility. And sometimes, someone will ask a question which is quite deep, and it can be very difficult to give an entry-level explanation. Sometimes, the best explanation (at a given level) is not a fully truthful one, because the truth is messy and full of little details. And sometimes, often, there are matters of judgement and personal preference, in which case there can be several different correct answers.

The most difficult questions of course are the ones which encode some misapprehensions - it's necessary to unpick the misapprehensions before getting to the truth of the matter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8507
Location: Midwestern USA
J64C wrote:
I almost feel like I'm not at the level I need to be to participate in this particular forum. :oops:

We all started at that "level." Excepting maybe Garth, none of us was born knowing this stuff. :D

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
Thanks guys! This does actually make me feel better.

I'm the first to admit that I have lots to learn. But, what I do learn, I try to learn as well as I can. I'm not one to take short cuts. And if I do take short cuts (in someone else's eyes), it is more than likely it's because I don't know any better, at the time. I try to do everything to the best of my ability and take pride in what I do. That can sometime come across as arrogance, but I assure you it's purely excitement. I often run around the house with circuit boards I have just made, showing my kids "the awesomeness!! :lol:". The kids just roll their eyes and say "yeah, great Dad... :roll: ". Haha!

My background started out as an apprentice in electronics, servicing office equipment in the mid 90's. The schooling side of it was 8 weeks a year at university in blocks of 2 weeks at a time, for three years, in which is now considered as 'Advanced Certificate in Electronics'. I did extremely well, coming first every year out of 150 students. But admittedly the course was fairly basic compared in the scheme of things and didn't even touch on some of the concepts I am getting to grips with here.

It's only over the past twelve months that I have gotten back in to playing around with electronics, with the goal of finally building that computer from scratch.

So that's pretty much me in a nutshell, not a complete newbie, but happy to admit where I don't fully understand things. Hopefully you guys will find me approachable over time. I'm pretty easy to get along with. :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2021 4:25 am
Posts: 49
Walking into this forum and asking a question is like walking up to Jimi Hendrix and asking him how he 'does that one solo thingy, the WEEDLY WEEDLY WEEEEEEEE!!!!' Sometimes I beat myself up for knowing almost nothing and being such a newb but then I remember most here have been doing this stuff, hands on, for longer than I've been alive and I'm no spring chicken. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 2:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
Very true! :lol:

Feeling more confident with my project today. It's a mass of long wires and heaps of things connected all over the place.

Only running a simple routine, but have managed to dial up the frequency (doubling it each time) staring from a mere 1.5Hz. Amazingly it has been running stable for the past ten minutes at my target goal of 12.5 MHz!

Almost feels like if I can get away with that, with this mess, I'll be able to achieve anything. :D

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:33 pm
Posts: 1488
Location: Scotland
J64C wrote:
Very true! :lol:

Feeling more confident with my project today. It's a mass of long wires and heaps of things connected all over the place.

Only running a simple routine, but have managed to dial up the frequency (doubling it each time) staring from a mere 1.5Hz. Amazingly it has been running stable for the past ten minutes at my target goal of 12.5 MHz!

Almost feels like if I can get away with that, with this mess, I'll be able to achieve anything. :D

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.


Give it a go - you're not likely to damage anything... That's what I did with my Ruby boards - I started at 1Mhz and took it to 16Mhz on stripboard, then a double sided PCB. I've no real need to go faster as that's not my goal (and I know the memory is the bottleneck on the '816 board)

-Gordon

_________________
--
Gordon Henderson.
See my Ruby 6502 and 65816 SBC projects here: https://projects.drogon.net/ruby/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1119
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
J64C wrote:

I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.

Interested to see W65C816 runs at 25mhz, specifically 25.275mhz.
Bill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8507
Location: Midwestern USA
plasmo wrote:
J64C wrote:
I attempted to try my luck by doubling again to 25MHz, knowing full well I am way over the 14MHz rating and failed miserably. Which is totally fine by me. 12.5MHz is what I want.

Interested to see W65C816 runs at 25mhz, specifically 25.275mhz.

If you extrapolate the FMAX vs VDD curve shown in the data sheet, it would seem 25 MHz is possible on five volts. I ran POC V1.2 at 20 MHz without any issues.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2021 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:12 am
Posts: 155
That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V. Then you look at the graph and it does show ~25MHz at 5V. Then even ~40MHz at approx 7V.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2021 11:38 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8544
Location: Southern California
J64C wrote:
That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V

That's the conservative guarantee, to do at least 14. It may (and does) go faster, but it's just not guaranteed to. Forum member "Windfall" has a 65816 running at 24MHz at 3.3V! That's three times the 8MHz it's guaranteed to do at 3.3V.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: The J64C (version 0)
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2021 2:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8507
Location: Midwestern USA
J64C wrote:
That’s the thing, the manuals seem inconsistent. When you look at the W65C02 manual it states, 14MHz at 5V. Then you look at the graph and it does show ~25MHz at 5V. Then even ~40MHz at approx 7V.

Welcome to the wacky world of WDC documentation. Especially in their older data sheets, there are quite a few errors. Fortunately, their products are much better than the data sheets would lead you to believe.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: