6502.org Forum Projects Code Documents Tools Forum
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:52 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Hardware

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Kuzailongmane
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 5:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 3:52 am
Posts: 20
looking for a uart or Duart recommendations to replace 65c51n

also looking for ideas on whether or not to integrate the keyboard/ (mouse? ) onto the propeller chip.

_________________
It takes a truly intelligent person to know that there's always more to learn
Kuzai Longmane (They/Them)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
GARTHWILSON
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 6:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 1:09 am
Posts: 8546
Location: Southern California
Kuzailongmane wrote:
looking for a UART or DUART recommendations to replace 65c51n

One of the favorites here has been the 28L92; but unfortunately it has recently been discontinued.  See this forum topic, which also gives alternatives that are partially compatible.  Myself, I'm going for the MAX3100 SPI-interfaced UART next.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
BigDumbDinosaur
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2023 6:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8514
Location: Midwestern USA
Kuzailongmane wrote:
looking for a uart or Duart recommendations to replace 65c51n

You could take a look at the TI 28L92 or the MaxLinear XR88C192CV-F. Both are compatible with the NXP SC28L92, which is what I have used in my POC units since V1.1. The TI and MaxLinear parts are QFP44, but should be manageable if you have reasonably good eyesight and steady hands.

MaxLinear also produces the XR88C92CJ-F, which is similar to the XR88C192CV-F, but with 8-deep FIFOs and in a PLCC44 package, which can be socketed.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Kuzailongmane
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 3:52 am
Posts: 20
UPDATE!!!

After some consideration, I've decided to ditch the serial port.
I figured if I need one that bad ill put it on an add-on card.
my main issue now is routing the PCB. included below are the files for the ENTIRE project in KICAD.
please, as always feel free to give feedback and point out any oopsie on my part!
Attachment:
File comment: Kicad 6.0
Tinderbox.zip [9.32 MiB]
Downloaded 18 times


***NOTE: The extra pin headers on the CPU and PROP page ARE intentional, I just couldn't get them to work on another hierarchical page :evil: ***
Thanks a million to all those who have been helpful as possible whilst putting up with my goofiness and schematic tomfoolery!

_________________
It takes a truly intelligent person to know that there's always more to learn
Kuzai Longmane (They/Them)
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Board index » 6502.org Users Forum » Hardware

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
6502.org is an ongoing project by Mike Naberezny and contributors.