The schematic specifies a pair of LM340-5s to generate two separate regulated +5V supplies, a 7812 for the +12V regulator, and a 7905 for the -5V regulator. Of these, only the 7905 is actually present in your photo, next to the big silver 16V capacitor.

In place of the other three are a pair of LM323Ks for +5V regulation and an LM340-12 for the +12V. These are the big cans embedded in the black heatsink, which has a relatively new-looking sticker on it. It may be evidence of a repair already carried out, or merely substitution of equivalent parts during manufacture.

This should lead you to four voltages which can be tested.

So I have been able to measure the voltages on at the RAM chips, Ive found following Voltages present in following Pins:

Pin 1: -5.20 V
Pin 9: 4.95 V
Pin 8: 11.71V
Pin 16: Ground

I checked all ram chips and they all show the same voltages.

i wasnt able to take the reading off of the LM323K's that Chromatix pointed out, but the voltages were measured at other points in the board.

Having the machine on for the 15 or so minutes that it took me to make these readings i noticed the RAM chips were getting noticeably warm, so I checked all the other chips too and the ROM chips were getting very toasty so i turned the machine off again.

@Martin A: it might be a RAM upgrade, or probably is because the type of chip in the second memory bank is of the type NEC PD416 while the first memory bank has MK4116N chips. Did the RAM upgrade need any changes done to the board or could you just solder in new set?

Also, In my previous post i was posting some pictures asking if "this was normal". Comparing different pictures of PET 2001N boards, i think ive found some differences in at least on of the parts, labelled: SH1.
It has pins called A B C D E F. On all the pictures i find, the connections on A, B, and E seem cut, while the connections on C, D, and F seem untouched.
On my board, it is the following: A, B, D, and E are cut, while C, and F are connected.

sadly my board does not have the parts labelled so im attaching a picture where the board is clearly labelled.



Emmanuel

Okay, but the most significant diagnostic we haven't yet seen is whether the clock is running. My multimeter has a frequency and duty cycle setting, which is what I'd preferably use, but simply getting an AC voltage reading on the Phi0, Phi1 and Phi2 pins of the 6502 would be a start.

So i found the Phi0, Phi1, and Phi,2 (i think)

Pin 37, is Phi0 at 1.67 V
Pin 3, is Phi1 at 2.35 V
Pin 39, is Phi2 at 2.3 V
Pin 1, is Ground

also my logic probe is on its way so i can find out about the clock soon enough

Emmanuel

Edit: I found an other great resource on zimmers.net about the DIP shunt settings so im thinking about replacing the two with DIP switches considering in how bad of a shape the one are that are inside.

See https://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~schepers/MJK/6502.html for example:
3 ø1 Phi1 out
37 ø0 Phi 0 in
39 ø2 Phi2 out
Personally I'd use ϕ not ø. Sometimes you might even see people use θ which is a different letter entirely...

Thank you for the quick reply, i did find it with a bit more applying myself. Im sorry im totally new to all of this kind of work.

Emmanuel

Those voltages are all okay.


It’s normal for that type (MK4116N and NEC PD416) of DRAM chip to run warm.

I don’t have a PET, so don’t know about the type of ROM chips used. However, if you can’t touch one with your finger, even briefly because it is too hot, then it may be faulty.



The MK4116N and NEC PD416 are equivalents to each other. Both are 16k bit DRAM chips (often described as 1 x 16384), each chip provides one data in and one data out pin, hence to store a byte for a 8 bit microprocessor like the 6502 you need eight of these chips (8 x 16k bits = 16k bytes).

Using you multimeter on the 20V DC range (or equivalent), can you please test pin 40 (/RESET) on the 6502. Also pins 4 (/IRQ), 6 (/NMI) and 7 (Sync).

Mark

Ø is defined as "phase" in electrical power transmission and distribution, so it does make some sense in terms of the two-phase clock used by the 6502. Greek letter Φ (pronounced "fee") is also widely used. I've used Ø for as long as I've known about the 6502 (43 years).

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!

Yikes, it's "fie" for me. A quick search yields

Hi Mark



So ive tested the voltages on the pins. I have the following readings:

Pin 40: 5.14 V
Pin 4: 0.12V
Pin 6: 5.13 V
Pin 7: 0.93 V

And touching the ROM is ok, its pretty warm but i could probably have my fingers on it indefinitely..

Emmanuel

Maybe it's one of those differences between American Greek and British Greek?

BTW, on Garth's site, he also says:

"Φ" is pronounced "fee,"...

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!

Double yikes.

My dictionary does suggest different pronunciations for British (fʌɪ) and American English (fï). International examples, however, follow the British example, except for the Modern Greek one.

_________________
http://WilsonMinesCo.com/ lots of 6502 resources
The "second front page" is http://wilsonminesco.com/links.html .
What's an additional VIA among friends, anyhow?

So while everyone is busy debating the pronounciation of phi, the big new is that it looks like /IRQ is asserted, which is definitely a problem.