6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Thu May 23, 2024 3:46 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2021 1:37 pm
Posts: 282
Awesome! Great to see it working :mrgreen:

_________________
BB816 Computer YouTube series


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 3354
Location: Ontario, Canada
Happy to hear about your success, rehsd. (Nice catch, Adrien!)

-- Jeff

_________________
In 1988 my 65C02 got six new registers and 44 new full-speed instructions!
https://laughtonelectronics.com/Arcana/ ... mmary.html


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2022 2:18 am
Posts: 47
akohlbecker wrote:
Awesome! Great to see it working :mrgreen:

I chuckled today. I went to connect a VIA to my 65816, and I pulled up the code I had originally written a few weeks ago for it. Guess what? It had the reset vector in it! :roll: So, somewhere along the way, I accidentally dropped the reset vector. Oops. :)

If you're interested, I have a VIA running now.

https://www.rehsdonline.com/post/65816-via1-working

https://youtu.be/kHPb11BXB1A


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:45 am
Posts: 311
Location: A magnetic field
Your six(?) chip decode is clever because it has no wasted sections. However, you might have under-estimated the official latency by not counting the address latch. The result is still likely to require less than 100ns in good conditions and attain 4MHz with 150ns ROM. However, it is definitely possible to do more with less.

I'm alarmed by the size of your board which is almost four times the size of the smallest EuroCard - and that's above average on the 6502 Forum. Some of your problems might be caused by board area. In particular, you might have power distribution problems.

Dr Jefyll on Sat 26 Feb 2022 wrote:
You mentioned you've been following Adrien Kohlbecker's video series, and he's facing some of the same issues.


I quite like akohlbecker's "warts and all" approach due to its honesty. It is a very good compliment to numerous failures found within the 500 messages of POC Computer Version One. We learn more from the mistakes of others than their success. However, it is highly inadvisable to copy unresolved problems and I usually have to lurk on the The Plagiarist’s section of Reddit to find this level of unintentional comedy.

Actually, I've quite enjoyed your numerous messages on Reddit and I'm surprised about your second system effect.

_________________
Modules | Processors | Boards | Boxes | Beep, Beep! I'm a sheep!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8191
Location: Midwestern USA
Sheep64 wrote:
I quite like akohlbecker's "warts and all" approach due to its honesty. It is a very good compliment to numerous failures found within the 500 messages of POC Computer Version One.

Indeed, failure, in the words of one of my instructors way back when, has a “divine” purpose: it tends to eliminate that which doesn't work. Over the years, I have found that to be eminently true and have never hesitated to report my failures, as well as my successes. At first, the former greatly outpaced the latter, but thanks to ever-increasing knowledge and experience—as well as a desire to avoid wasting money on stuff that doesn’t work, I’ve managed to partially reverse the failure:success ratio. :D

Quote:
We learn more from the mistakes of others than their success. However, it is highly inadvisable to copy unresolved problems...

That’s the crux of the aphorism (attributed to Albert Einstein) that says the definition of insanity is repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result each time. Which brings to mind something...

There are those around here who do not want to read anything negative about someone’s project, even though it may be rife with technical errors that will all-but-guarantee failure. All-too-often, said people will say we must be encouraging, no matter what. Dunno about you, but I’m not in the habit of encouraging failure—it will naturally occur, even absent encouragement. Encouraging someone to repeat the mistakes made in the past is insanity; the same mistakes will result in the same failures. Better to be encouraging by rationally describing the problems seen in a design and offering suggestions on how to correct them. If the designer adopts the suggestions, failure is less likely. If not, the designer will merely prove Einstein's aphorism to be true.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 1:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2021 11:21 am
Posts: 707
Location: Texas
BigDumbDinosaur wrote:
There are those around here who do not want to read anything negative about someone’s project, even though it may be rife with technical errors that will all-but-guarantee failure. All-too-often, said people will say we must be encouraging, no matter what. Dunno about you, but I’m not in the habit of encouraging failure—it will naturally occur, even absent encouragement. Encouraging someone to repeat the mistakes made in the past is insanity; the same mistakes will result in the same failures. Better to be encouraging by rationally describing the problems seen in a design and offering suggestions on how to correct them. If the designer adopts the suggestions, failure is less likely. If not, the designer will merely prove Einstein's aphorism to be true.


100% behind you BDD. Being a math teacher, I know the power of failure: To learn what NOT to do, and try again. The hardest thing for any student of any topic is to try again. And again. And again if necessary. It is even hard for me. If pointing out problems comes across as 'gruff', perhaps the receiving person is being too sensitive. I am a sensitive person myself, but I value the words of experts more than my feelings.

Your post was very encouraging to me BDD, especially above where your success/failure ratio as flipped. I hope to one day say the same. One day.

Everyone here has helped encourage me as well, and spur me on to better things. And that includes you BDD. So, thank you.

Lastly, to rehsd, I'm glad your board is working now! It is a good feeling indeed. Sorry for jumping in unexpectedly but BDD's post was too good to pass up.

Chad


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2022 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10802
Location: England
Everyone here, I'm sure, is in favour of helpful criticism and input. It would be wrong to suggest otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:45 am
Posts: 311
Location: A magnetic field
Sheep64 on Sun 6 Mar 2022 wrote:
Your six(?) chip decode is clever because it has no wasted sections.


Apologies. I was looking at akohlbecker's design. You might be using the same design software but I am often amazed by other people's ingenuity.

Anyhow, now that you've switched from 6502 to 65816 and CPLD, you have enough dormant resources to make a UART. You might need an inverter or want a buffer but it is possible to use 65816 EMU pin for UART transmit. plasmo recommends using 65816 M/X pin for UART transmit and CPLD for framing of 8N1 input.

EMU and M/X pins can also be used for servo control or digital LED control. Meanwhile, unused CPLD cells can be used for potentiometer reading or mouse positioning. See EEVblog #1054 - How an Analog PC Joystick Works for potentiometer. The POKEY chip in an Atari 2600 game console may have similar functionality.

_________________
Modules | Processors | Boards | Boxes | Beep, Beep! I'm a sheep!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2022 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2021 1:37 pm
Posts: 282
Sheep64 wrote:
Sheep64 on Sun 6 Mar 2022 wrote:
Your six(?) chip decode is clever because it has no wasted sections.


Apologies. I was looking at akohlbecker's design.


Thanks, it is quite satisfying to optimize a circuit to fill only a limited number of chips, but use every gate available, even though wasted gates don't actually matter that much. A fun challenge!

_________________
BB816 Computer YouTube series


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: