6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:56 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:08 pm
Posts: 990
Location: near Heidelberg, Germany
So far I have used the Xilinx xc95288xl CPLD in my MicroPET and UltraPET designs. They are unfortunately still unobtainable right now, so I'm looking for alternatives.

So far I've used the 5V tolerance of the xc9500xl series, but I've already updated the UltraPET CPU board to a 3.3V only (untested and unreleased as of now). Also, due to higher complexity of the Colour handling I've had to remove some features from the UltraPET CPLD code to make it fit and I'd like those features back and more...

So, my requirements for an alternative are:
- obtainable for a reasonable price
- free dev environment (as in no cost, like Xilinx WebISE), supported on Linux hosts
- 3.3V, no 5V tolerance needed
- approx. 50%-100% larger (in terms of number of macro cells)
- TQFP144 pinout
- 5-7ns "speed"
- instant on, no separate config ROM

I'd even go for small FPGAs if they fulfill these reqs. Do you have any suggestions I should be looking at?
I've looked at some alternatives mentioned here but they typically were too small....

Mamy thanks in advance
André

_________________
Author of the GeckOS multitasking operating system, the usb65 stack, designer of the Micro-PET and many more 6502 content: http://6502.org/users/andre/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: England
It's a good question, but I think obtainable is the big one these days. Did you look at Lattice FPGAs? It looks like the MachX02 series is supported by the opensource toolchain yosys and nextpnr.

Maybe a search like this will help - filtered by availability, sorted by price:
https://www.mouser.co.uk/c/semiconducto ... rt=pricing


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8144
Location: Midwestern USA
Take a look at Atmel's ATF1508AS, which has 128 macrocells, and is available in PQFP-160, speeds down to 7.5ns, 3.3 volt operation and support for JTAG programming. The WinCUPL development package is free, but alas, only runs on Windows. My understanding is some users have done development using the Xilinx tools and then translated the output to a JED that is compatible with the Atmel part.

The ATF1508AS is in current production.


Attachments:
File comment: Atmel ATF1508AS CPLD
atf1508as.pdf [690.1 KiB]
Downloaded 60 times

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: England
Certainly possible to run WinCUPL and CUPL on linux, using Wine.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 6:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 1:05 am
Posts: 1076
Location: Albuquerque NM USA
Max2 family CPLD operates at 3.3V and have more logic than XC95288. EPM570 has 570 logic elements and EPM1270 has 1270 logic elements. They are available in TQFP144 but you’ll need to buy them from china.
Bill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:08 pm
Posts: 990
Location: near Heidelberg, Germany
I tried to look for details on the MachXO2, but mouser does not even have it in the catalog. Is this chip still current?

I should probably add as requirement that the device should be one currently produced...

_________________
Author of the GeckOS multitasking operating system, the usb65 stack, designer of the Micro-PET and many more 6502 content: http://6502.org/users/andre/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:52 am
Posts: 745
Location: Germany
the MachXO2 is still very much in production and supported by Lattice's current software.
remember that we're still in a chip shortage! so it's simply sold out everywhere and won't be aviaible for a while. (maybe you had the "in stock" filter enabled on mouser so that's why none of MachXO2 chips showed up)
here's the one i bought last year before the chip shortage fully kicked in: https://www.mouser.de/ProductDetail/842 ... 0HC5TG100C
right now it sits at ~12 EUR, back when i bought it it was only ~8 EUR. i kinda wish i bought multiple of them because it's a pretty cool chip. lots of logic for little money


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: CPLD alternatives?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 29, 2022 6:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:08 pm
Posts: 990
Location: near Heidelberg, Germany
Thanks, that helped. It seems the MachXO2 from the autocompletion works differently... only gives a couple of results, no FPGA - but using the brand name search shows it.

Edit: I am on mobile and the drop down is way too large ... so I clicked the first MachXO2 entry, which was the category "!to be used with" and that of course is not the FPGA itself..

_________________
Author of the GeckOS multitasking operating system, the usb65 stack, designer of the Micro-PET and many more 6502 content: http://6502.org/users/andre/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: