6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sun Jun 16, 2024 7:25 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
Some days ago I created an overlay of my (admittedly bad quality) die shot of the

8500R4 (aka 6510) and 8501R4.

I'm quite sure that the 6510 was developed BEFORE the 8501... but
the layout of the later 8500R4 seems to be derived from the 8501R4
or maybe they created them with having the variants already in their minds?!

But better see yourself (please be patient while it loads):

https://is.gd/rgcifA

Please note the metal lines at the right part of the chip:

Attachment:
850x.jpg
850x.jpg [ 319.52 KiB | Viewed 2762 times ]


Doesn't really make sense for the 8500... that's why I think the 8501 came first!

Does someone have shots of the MOS8502? I'd bet it's the same except the I/O port section.


Last edited by fhw72 on Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:11 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
No real layout comparison... but maybe someone wants to take a look at the

Metal and Poly layer of the MOS8360R2 aka "TED"

from the Commodore C16/plus4 line of computers: https://is.gd/ZC6VrT

Or the 6509R7 CPU: https://is.gd/spxeF5


Enjoy the slide.... :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10827
Location: England
Interesting finding and an interesting tool for comparisons...

I wonder when CSG got computer aided design? It's possible to copy and paste once your layout is vectors in a computer - but the original 6502 was a ruby-lith layout done with sharp knives. So, at some point, I'd suppose, MOS/CSG would have digitised that layout and started on a journey of making derived designs.

Is it possible that the 6510 was its own thing at the time but the 8500 was a later recreation? It's surprising (to me) that the 8500 has 8 bits of I/O port logic, with 8 pads, but only 6 pads bonded. Was there a chip which used all 8 bits of the port? Or a plan for such a chip?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
The 8502 used more bits of the port (7 bits)!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
Here's a comparison of the 6510 and 8500:

https://is.gd/ad5OyB

Please note that the main core in the middle is the same size (proportionally) but the outer
perimeter (i.e. drivers, ports etc.) are stretched vertically - a little bit.

PLA/Decode rom is also perfectly aligned!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
Did you ever want to skin the CIA? :D

https://is.gd/Qsy6lh


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10827
Location: England
Nice! Are there any bugs or idiosyncrasies in the 6526 which might inspire a look at the transistor netlist?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
BigEd wrote:
Nice! Are there any bugs or idiosyncrasies in the 6526 which might inspire a look at the transistor netlist?


Yes... I want to check the *EXACT* differences between the 6526R4 and the successor 8521R1 (which was labeled 6526 as it's identical
in fucntionality but has some differences in the interrupt control).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
I redid the 8500R4 vs. 8501R4 comparison:

Vertical slider: https://is.gd/8ECZRp

Horizontal slider: https://is.gd/ZWHAMC


Enjoy!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:29 pm
Posts: 192
Location: Madrid, Spain
Beautiful!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 1:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
daniMolina wrote:
Beautiful!


Then you might like this one too:

https://is.gd/ivRQTB

It's the overlay of metal and poly layer.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 7:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
Someone wanted to know the differences between

MOS8501R1 <-> MOS8501R4

Here we go:

https://is.gd/6fcY1U

GATEIN Logic seems untouched. What I can see so far:

MOS8501R1 still has the (unused!) SYNC pin logic (moved between pads for NMI# and IRQ#).
This logic was replaced with a back bias generator.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
Yet another one just finished:

MOS8726R1

https://is.gd/fk6HzZ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2019 9:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
In order to dig a little deeper in the 6522R0 I restitched the publicly available pictures
of the 6522R0 and realigned metal and poly layer:

https://is.gd/WM2hJr


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:58 am
Posts: 91
And here another one:

https://is.gd/lZ4IZn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: