Recently, perusing some now-lost thread, I came across a link to a pdf of a 1990 W65C265 manual. It looks like it was typed up on a Selectric and Xeroxed a couple of times, but semantically, the quality of the document is so much better than the modern manual! (maybe - see below). I found myself actually understanding some things at a glance - while the newer document seems to lead me around in circles...
Unfortunately the pdf I have is a scan of the original and does not support cut/paste or search.
Does anyone have the old - preferrably ASCII or thereabouts - copies of WDC documents?
Thanks in advance.
A quick comparisonA lot of text is copied verbatim into the new manuals, but some of it is pretty different (1.6 Interrupt flag registers, for instance) - and at least sounds like it makes more sense than the subsequent effort to eliminate paragraph numbers and 'streamline the text'.
Instead of idiotic colorful tables with 'prettier' frames that take up the entire page each, TIER and TIFR register descriptions, for instance, fit on the same page as the Interrupt Enable Registers write-up, and actually demonstrate how they are connected with interrupt priority logic - instantly giving me a sense of how the timer interrupts are organized. That's 3 pages with graphics that make little sense vs 1 page with text boxes that make total sense. That's Progress (along with the machines to process a 2MB file vs an 100k file).
Compare:
Attachment:
2.wdc.png [ 112.93 KiB | Viewed 495 times ]
to one of 3 pages (replacing a few lines of text above):
Attachment:
1.wdc.png [ 89.41 KiB | Viewed 495 times ]
Now what in the world is a point of making a page-long table instead of noting that TIER0-TIER7 bits enable the corresponding interrupt?
Even the old manual starts out concisely with TIER, but for some reason, TIFR spells out every bit as "Timer Blah" interrupt. Since we are already numbered, why not just say bits TIFR0-TIFR7 are flags set by the corresponding interrupt?
My working theory is that some jackass, possibly Steve Jobs, demanded 'professional-looking documentation'. Runner-up: someone was paid by the page to rewrite the manual.