6502.org Forum  Projects  Code  Documents  Tools  Forum
It is currently Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:18 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Decoupling capacitors
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 365
What value capacitors should I use for a 65C02 and 28 series EEPROM? Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:31 pm
Posts: 578
I built Rich Cini's design (http://www.classiccmp.org/cini/6502proj.htm) and he uses 0.1 uF ceramic capacitors for decoupling.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8414
Location: Midwestern USA
Druzyek wrote:
What value capacitors should I use for a 65C02 and 28 series EEPROM? Thanks!
Martin_H wrote:
I built Rich Cini's design (http://www.classiccmp.org/cini/6502proj.htm) and he uses 0.1 uF ceramic capacitors for decoupling.

Note that not all ceramic capacitors are created equal. Some have excessive ESR and/or ESL, which will compromise the capacitor's ability to bypass the high frequency noise generated as devices change state. Garth Wilson and I recommend the use of MLCC types with an X7R temperature coefficient, rated at 0.1 µF at 50 VDC. I built POC V1.1 with AVX MLCCs and have gotten good results. These capacitors are quite inexpensive, so there is really no good excuse for not being liberal with them.

Each device should have one such capacitor, with it installed as close as possible to the Vcc pin. Keep the leads as short as practicable for best results. It's also a good idea to place one of these capacitors as close as possible to the point where Vcc enters the board, along with a low ESR electrolytic of at least 100 µF (500 to 1000 is better) at 10 or 16 volts (10 is better, if available). If the board is fairly large another electrolytic should be placed at the "other end" of the Vcc/ground distribution, along with an MLCC.

The seemingly high MLCC voltage rating has to do with a characteristic in which the capacitance rapidly degrades once the working voltage is exceeded. Although most of our circuits operate at a nominal 5 volts, ringing and miscellaneous transients can cause voltage excursions well in excess of Vcc.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10949
Location: England
Why is 10 better than 16, BDD??


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8414
Location: Midwestern USA
BigEd wrote:
Why is 10 better than 16, BDD??

Some electrolytics won't produce their rated capacitance if the working voltage is too low relative to the capacitor's rated voltage.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:28 pm
Posts: 10949
Location: England
So, both too high and too low reduce the effective capacitance?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 8414
Location: Midwestern USA
BigEd wrote:
So, both too high and too low reduce the effective capacitance?

The effect on capacitance when the working voltage is well below the rated voltage seems to vary. I don't think there is a hard and fast rule on it.

Naturally, if the working voltage exceeds the capacitor's rated voltage a breakdown may occur and cause a catastrophic failure. My practice has always been to limit the working voltage to no more than 85 percent of the capacitor's rated voltage.

_________________
x86?  We ain't got no x86.  We don't NEED no stinking x86!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:24 am
Posts: 740
Location: A missile silo somewhere under southern England
I use 100nF (0.1uF) MLCC ceramic capacitors rated at 50V as well. Does the job, especially if using one per IC.
I also tend to use 33uF Tantalums every 5th IC (or so) to deal with any largish dips in the power rail. Tantalums are quite goods for this as they offer a fast reactance with a decent capacity rating. Down side is that they are more expensive by quite a bit than electrolytics.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: