lenzjo wrote:
nyef: I appreciate the search but the reason I'm looking at a usb o'scope is space, when not in use I can store it in a drawer.
Keep in mind that the USB 'scope requires at least a laptop on the workbench, and that plus the 'scope will take more room on the workbench than many stand-alone oscilloscopes.
Quote:
Garth: "The second one looks very good for the price." Does that mean a) Good piece of kit, go get it, or b) It'll do in a pinch, but look for something better.
Somewhere in between those two. I'd rather have a real, stand-alone 'scope, but if you can't afford one and can't find a school that's giving away ones they've replaced, then get the one you linked to. One thing we all tend to do, and it's valid, is to get something inexpensive at first, and on that, we learn what the value of a more-expensive one is and what features to look for after we've gotten ourselves into the mindset of justifying spending more. If you want something else after a while, the USB 'scope at its cheap price will not have been any big loss.
lenzjo wrote:
chuckT: thx for that link, I used an o'scope once or twice in the past but never really used one if you know what I mean. I'll watch the vid (2+hrs) at the weekend when I have time.
Old-fashioned oscilloscopes with knobs and switches are mostly pretty intuitive. I have seen scopemeters though which resemble a huge DMM with a large screen and serve as an oscilloscope too (with suitable probes) which look like they would be really nice after you get through a long learning process because they're not intuitive at all. Anything new that you get should come with a manual anyway, showing how to access functions beyond the rudiments.